Corporate legal departments may have once operated as risk-averse gatekeepers, but today’s in-house counsel are expected to serve as strategic business enablers. They want to shake off the stigmas...
A recent commissioned study by one of the world’s leading independent business research and advisory firms has provided significant findings of the measurable impact that a legal AI platform can...
In-house legal departments are experiencing notable shifts in hiring trends at all levels starting with the general counsel role. A recent study from Russell Reynolds Associates found that GC turnover...
If you’ve ever sat across the table at a settlement negotiation wishing you knew how similar cases had resolved, you’re not alone. That’s exactly the challenge Lex Machina and Lexis Verdict...
By Tony Muljadi | VP of Large Law, LexisNexis As LexisNexis deepens its investment in innovative legal technology, our strategic alliance with Harvey has sparked plenty of thoughtful questions from our...
* The views expressed in externally authored materials linked or published on this site do not necessarily reflect the views of LexisNexis Legal & Professional.
Judges in state and federal courts generally agree that during COVID times, virtual litigation is the only way to keep the U.S. court system moving forward. And while it’s not ideal to litigate remotely—for example, there’s no guarantee that remote jurors are actually paying attention to the case—it is necessary. It’s unclear when in-person litigation will be an option again, so virtual litigation is likely here to stay (at least for a while).
Although it’s not perfect, there are some positives to virtual litigation. Some jurors, for example, have reported that Zoom makes it easier to see a witness’s face (versus sitting far away from them in a physical courtroom). For the same reason, they also report being able to see evidence or exhibits more clearly.
Even if you’ve managed to avoid remote litigation thus far, chances are that before long, it will be every litigator’s reality. As with any new endeavor, it’s important to do your homework beforehand and come to the table prepared. Here are some tips that can set you up for success before entering a virtual courtroom.
1. Presenting evidence and exhibits:
2. Navigating breakout rooms and waiting rooms:
Treat breakout rooms and waiting rooms like you would the real thing. For example, while sitting in a virtual waiting room with opposing counsel while you wait for the judge to take your case, consider using that time to discuss the case just as you would in the courthouse hallway. Making the most of your time is key, virtual or not. Also be aware that video or audio recording could continue during breaks or in breakout rooms, so don’t get too comfortable.
3. Juggling rules specific to jurisdiction or judge:
Be sure to take time to research the rules of your jurisdiction or judge ahead of time, such as the swearing in of witnesses. Some court reporters (depending on location) will not swear in a witness if they cannot do so in person. Similarly, check your judge’s website to see if he or she has any special procedures for Zoom hearings. Different judges may have preferences for things such as mute procedures, presenting evidence, and recording rules. For example, the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California prohibits the recording of court proceedings held by video or teleconference.
4. Making sure the transcriptionist knows who is speaking:
It may seem basic, but it’s easy to forget in the middle of a heated trial: it’s exceedingly important to identify yourself before speaking so that there is no confusion on the record. Also be sure to speak slowly in case there is some lag in the audio—this will help the stenographer get an accurate transcript.
While virtual court proceedings are inconvenient and require more planning, by the time you’ve had your third or fourth remote appearance, these elements will start to become second nature.