Free subscription to the Capitol Journal keeps you current on legislative and regulatory news.
States Continue to Target AI-Driven Rental Pricing Nineteen states are considering bills that would limit the use of third-party software relying on competitor data to set rental housing prices, according...
Trump, Congress Weigh Measures to Preempt State AI Laws The Trump administration circulated—and then put on hold—a draft executive order aimed at preempting state laws regulating artificial...
Last year, after Colorado and California became the first states in the nation to expand privacy protections to include neural data, we said more states could follow suit . This year two more have done...
MI Lawmakers Advance Medical Debt Protections The Michigan Senate’s Health Policy Committee has advanced a trio of bipartisan bills aimed at reducing the burden of medical costs on residents of...
EU Reversing Course on Tech Regulation After aggressively regulating the technology industry for over a decade, the European Union is moving to loosen its landmark digital privacy and artificial intelligence...
* The views expressed in externally authored materials linked or published on this site do not necessarily reflect the views of LexisNexis Legal & Professional.
A federal judge gave the go-ahead for a lawsuit accusing Geico Corp. of overcharging over 2 million California policyholders for car insurance early in the coronavirus pandemic may proceed as a class action.
Geico decided to provide $2.5 billion in credits, including 15 percent off renewals to policyholders, beginning in April 2020, in acknowledgement that they were driving less and getting into fewer accidents. But policyholders balked at the “Geico Giveback” program, contending the amount of the credit was “well short” of the “substantial and full relief” Geico claimed it was, given the substantial reduction in risks.
U.S. District Judge Beth Labson Freeman in San Jose, California said a class action was preferable to numerous individual lawsuits and that the plaintiffs’ damages model could provide “an appropriate percentage refund over a sufficiently long time” to be manageable. (INSURANCE JOURNAL)
A study by North Carolina State University found that federal flood maps are misleading and preventing homeowners who actually need flood insurance from purchasing it.
“In fact, only about 4% of homeowners nationwide have flood insurance — a problem that can be largely attributed to the flood maps created by the Federal Emergency Management Agency,” the report states.
FEMA’s maps show designated flood hazard areas considered to be most at risk from a 100-year flood event. Homeowners in such areas are generally required to purchase flood insurance to obtain a federally backed mortgage. Homeowners outside of those zones, however, are not, leaving many in vulnerable areas unprotected.
“We’re seeing that there’s a lot of flood damage being reported outside of the 100-year floodplain,” said the lead author of the study, Elyssa Collins, a doctoral candidate at NC State’s Center for Geospatial Analytics.
A study in 2020 by Rice University found that nearly twice as many properties were vulnerable to a 100-year flood than the FEMA maps indicated. (INSURANCE JOURNAL, NORTH CAROLINA STATE UNIVERSITY)
The U.S. Treasury Department’s Financial Crimes Enforcement Network reported that it received 1,489 ransomware-related filings totaling almost $1.2 billion from U.S. financial institutions in 2021. That sum is a 188 percent increase from the $416 million total for 2020. The majority of the attacks were carried out by groups tied to Russia. (BLOOMBERG, FINCEN)
-- Compiled by KOREY CLARK