Free subscription to the Capitol Journal keeps you current on legislative and regulatory news.
‘Unauthorized Alien’ Limits Among Trio of Auto Insurance Proposals Under Consideration in LA House Three auto insurance bills cleared the Louisiana House Committee on Civil Law and Procedure...
Social Media Bill Dodges Veto Override in CO Colorado Gov. Jared Polis’ (D) veto of a social media bill ( SB 86 ) survived an override attempt. The state’s Democrat-controlled Senate voted...
WA Enacts Law Keeping Medical Debt Off Credit Reports Washington Gov. Bob Ferguson (D) signed a bill ( SB 5480 ) prohibiting collection agencies from reporting unpaid medical debt to credit agencies...
In 2022, there were about 22 maternal deaths for every 100,000 live births in the United States. That’s the highest rate of maternal deaths among high-income nations worldwide. That sobering statistic...
DOGE-Like Effort in FL Could Impact Insurance Industry The wave of housecleaning that’s swept through the federal government courtesy of Elon Musk's Department of Government Efficiency appears...
Although employers seem to be leaning toward encouraging their workers to get vaccinated for COVID-19 over requiring them to do so, the very real prospect of such mandates has sparked a flurry of debate on social media as well as a number of lawsuits.
Much of the discussion and legal action has revolved around the question of whether or not it’s legal to mandate vaccines that have only received Emergency Use Authorization rather than outright approval by the U.S. Food & Drug Administration.
Erik Eisenmann, a partner at the legal firm of Husch Blackwell who specializes in employment law, said, “I am not aware of any court or agency at the state or federal level that has held that the Emergency Use Authorization language prohibits an employer from enforcing a vaccine mandate.”
Nicholas Bagley, a professor at the University of Michigan Law School, likewise, said the EUA “argument looks good for about a half-second, and then, as soon as you start digging, it starts to look much, much worse.”
But Bagley also said the strong political opinions about vaccination could lead to some unexpected legal decisions.
“I would expect that we see some case law fairly quickly,” he said. “But once political sympathies are engaged, it just becomes a whole lot harder to predict.” (INSURANCE JOURNAL)
Washington Gov. Jay Inslee (D) has amended the executive proclamation he issued and extended last year concerning workplace protections for high-risk workers during the coronavirus pandemic. The three main changes to Proclamation 20-46 will allow employers to require medical verification from employees availing themselves of the workplace protections; allow employers to terminate health coverage under certain conditions, and require employers to provide written notice of any workplace accommodation changes at least 14 days before making them. (SHRM, JACKSON LEWIS)
Kentucky is currently one of 28 states allowed by the federal Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) to set their own occupational safety and health standards and one of just a few that have adopted standards stricter than federal regulations. But under legislation (HB 475) enacted in March and taking effect on July 2, the Kentucky Labor Cabinet’s Department of Workplace Standards, Division of Occupational Safety and Health (KOSH) will no longer be allowed to adopt or enforce standards that are more stringent than the corresponding federal ones. (SHRM, STATE NET)
Indiana Gov. Eric Holcomb (R) signed legislation (HB 1309) last month allowing pregnant workers to request an accommodation from their employers. The new law will apply to businesses with 15 or more employees and will take effect on July 1. (SHRM, STATE NET)
-- Compiled by KOREY CLARK