Free subscription to the Capitol Journal keeps you current on legislative and regulatory news.
SC Proposes Rate Cuts for Some Credit Property Insurance South Carolina’s Department of Insurance plans to cut the rates for some credit property insurance, which lenders sometimes require to protect...
States Eying Higher Electricity Rates for Data Centers At least a dozen states are considering ways to make data centers pay more for their power, with evidence mounting that data center demand is driving...
Evers Vetoes Insurance Reg Exemption for Direct Primary Care Doctors Wisconsin Gov. Tony Evers (D) vetoed a bill ( SB 4 ) that would have exempted primary care doctors who provide care to patients who...
A few months ago we reported on state legislation targeting “predictive pricing,” the use of “data analytics, machine learning and algorithms to anticipate market demand and adjust prices...
CA Regulators Complete Review of Wildfire Risk Model California’s Department of Insurance has completed a review of the state’s first wildfire catastrophe model, which property/casualty insurers...
* The views expressed in externally authored materials linked or published on this site do not necessarily reflect the views of LexisNexis Legal & Professional.
The Illinois Bankers Association and other organizations filed a federal lawsuit to block a new Illinois law limiting banks from charging interchange, or “swipe,” fees on tax and tip revenues. The Interchange Fee Prohibition Act is scheduled to take effect on July 1 next year. (CENTER SQUARE)
Washington State Insurance Commissioner Mike Kreidler (D) has proposed delaying Phase 2 of a recently adopted insurance premium change transparency rule for two years, from June 2027 to June 2029. Phase 1 of the rule, which took effect in June of this year, requires homeowners and auto insurers to disclose to policyholders why their premiums have increased when asked. Phase 2 will require the reasons for premium increases to be included in policy renewals. (INSURANCE JOURNAL)
The U.S. 11th Circuit Court of Appeals ruled that insurance carriers can’t be held responsible when banks improperly cash checks made out to two insureds and give the proceeds to just one of them. The federal appeals court’s decision—involving Markel American Insurance Co. and a pair of Florida-based truck-leasing firms—and a similar ruling by a state-level appellate court in Florida in 2022 means insurers in the state are unlikely to face similar lawsuits in the future. (INSURANCE JOURNAL)
—Compiled by SNCJ Managing Editor KOREY CLARK
Visit our webpage to connect with a LexisNexis® State Net® representative and learn how the State Net legislative and regulatory tracking service can help you identify, track, analyze and report on relevant legislative and regulatory developments.