Free subscription to the Capitol Journal keeps you current on legislative and regulatory news.
MI Lawmakers Advance Medical Debt Protections The Michigan Senate’s Health Policy Committee has advanced a trio of bipartisan bills aimed at reducing the burden of medical costs on residents of...
EU Reversing Course on Tech Regulation After aggressively regulating the technology industry for over a decade, the European Union is moving to loosen its landmark digital privacy and artificial intelligence...
On the last day of September, California Gov. Gavin Newsom (D) signed a bill increasing the Golden State’s authority over workplace disputes and union elections . AB 288 by Assemblywoman Tina McKinnor...
Wave of Chatbot Bills Coming Next Year State lawmakers are preparing to introduce a wave of measures in 2026 aimed at regulating AI chatbots, following the lead of California and New York, which enacted...
OH Seeks to Loosen Hourly Work Restrictions for Minors Ohio lawmakers took action this month to extend the hours minors can work in the state. On Nov. 7 they passed a bill ( SB 50 ) that would allow...
* The views expressed in externally authored materials linked or published on this site do not necessarily reflect the views of LexisNexis Legal & Professional.
In a special session that began last week, Colorado Senate Majority Leader Robert Rodriguez (D) introduced legislation (SB 4 a) that would make significant changes to the artificial intelligence law he led to passage last year (SB 205 [2024). That first-in-the-nation law raised concerns that it was too restrictive and would stifle AI development, and Rodriguez and Gov. Jared Polis (D) agreed to work with the tech industry to revise the law before it took effect. Negotiations on SB 4 a are ongoing, but as amended in committee, the measure would push back the effective date of SB 205 from February 2026 to May 2026 and shift more of the regulatory burden onto AI developers instead of deployers of the technology. (COLORADO SUN)
A federal appeals court ruled that Maryland’s first-in-the-nation tax on digital advertising, HB 732, enacted via a veto override in 2021, violates the Constitution by denying companies’ right to free speech. The law not only imposes a tax on the revenues large companies make from advertising on the internet but also prohibits those companies from informing customers how the tax affects pricing, such as via line items, surcharges or fees. (ASSOCIATED PRESS)
—Compiled by SNCJ Managing Editor KOREY CLARK
Visit our webpage to connect with a LexisNexis® State Net® representative and learn how the State Net legislative and regulatory tracking service can help you identify, track, analyze and report on relevant legislative and regulatory developments.