Free subscription to the Capitol Journal keeps you current on legislative and regulatory news.
CT Senate Passes Sweeping Consumer Protection Bill The Connecticut Senate passed an expansive consumer protection bill ( SB 5 ). Among other things, the measure would require service providers such as...
Social Media Warning Label Legislation Catching on in States Although Congress hasn’t responded to former U.S. Surgeon General Vivek Murthy’s call last June to take up legislation requiring...
OR Lawmakers Pass Age Discrimination Bill Oregon’s legislature passed a bill ( HB 3187 ) that would prohibit an employer from requesting an applicant’s age, date of birth or date of graduation...
WI Assembly Passes Multiple Healthcare Bills Wisconsin’s Assembly passed multiple healthcare-related bills with broad bipartisan support. One ( AB 43 ) would allow pharmacists to prescribe birth...
A nightmare may be coming to life for social media companies in Minnesota. There, Democrats in the state Legislature have embraced a pioneering bill, SB 3197 , which seeks to levy the nation’s...
State lawmakers who gathered last week for a panel discussion on artificial intelligence hosted by Pluribus News said they’re planning to introduce more AI bills in their next legislative sessions.
Texas Rep. Giovanni Capriglione (R), who sponsored a bill (HB 2060) enacted this year creating a state AI advisory council, said he’ll probably introduce an AI package in 2025, when his state meets for its next regular session. He said he had “zero faith” Congress would do anything on AI before then.
Connecticut Sen. James Maroney (D), who spearheaded the passage this year of a measure (SB 1103) creating an AI task force and setting limits on the use of AI by state government, said he’s working on legislation for next year that would set “broad guardrails” for AI transparency and accountability. And he indicated AI legislation would continue beyond next year.
“This isn’t going to be a one and done type of legislation,” he said.
The leader of a bipartisan, multistate virtual working group on AI, Maroney also said state lawmakers had learned from their experience with data privacy that they “need to get started earlier.”
As Capriglione put it: “We waited on the privacy stuff...and in the process of waiting, hundreds of thousands of data points on every single citizen was collected.”
Virginia Del. Michell Maldonado (D) said next year Virginia lawmakers could update the state’s comprehensive data privacy law passed in 2021, as well as another law passed last year addressing the use of facial recognition technology by law enforcement. She also said she wanted to prioritize regulation of high-risk areas like healthcare and criminal justice.
Meanwhile, Colorado’s newly-elected Senate majority leader, Sen. Robert Rodriguez (D), who led the passage of the Colorado Privacy Act in 2021, said he’s particularly concerned about the use of AI in the workplace, but getting tech regulation passed isn’t easy.
“I think throwing too many things at the kitchen sink is probably not the best idea,” he said. “To try to do it all at once would be a humongous lift.” (PLURIBUS NEWS, STATE NET)
The U.S. Supreme Court has agreed to hear challenges to laws passed in Florida and Texas in 2021 prohibiting social media platforms from banning users over potentially harmful content. Tech companies argue the laws violate their First Amendment rights. (CNBC)
A federal judge threw out a challenge to a Louisiana law requiring websites offering sexually explicit content to verify the ages of users. U.S. District Judge Susie Morgan ruled that the government officials named in the lawsuit can’t be sued because they aren’t required to enforce the law. An appeal is likely. (ASSOCIATED PRESS)
—Compiled by SNCJ Managing Editor KOREY CLARK
Please visit our webpage to connect with a State Net representative and learn how the State Net legislative and regulatory tracking solution can help you identify, track, analyze and report on relevant legislative and regulatory developments.
* The views expressed in externally authored materials linked or published on this site do not necessarily reflect the views of LexisNexis Legal & Professional.