Free subscription to the Capitol Journal keeps you current on legislative and regulatory news.
States Continue to Target AI-Driven Rental Pricing Nineteen states are considering bills that would limit the use of third-party software relying on competitor data to set rental housing prices, according...
Trump, Congress Weigh Measures to Preempt State AI Laws The Trump administration circulated—and then put on hold—a draft executive order aimed at preempting state laws regulating artificial...
Last year, after Colorado and California became the first states in the nation to expand privacy protections to include neural data, we said more states could follow suit . This year two more have done...
MI Lawmakers Advance Medical Debt Protections The Michigan Senate’s Health Policy Committee has advanced a trio of bipartisan bills aimed at reducing the burden of medical costs on residents of...
EU Reversing Course on Tech Regulation After aggressively regulating the technology industry for over a decade, the European Union is moving to loosen its landmark digital privacy and artificial intelligence...
* The views expressed in externally authored materials linked or published on this site do not necessarily reflect the views of LexisNexis Legal & Professional.
Vermont Gov. Phil Scott (R) vetoed HB 121, which would have been one of the strongest consumer data privacy laws in the nation, allowing residents to sue data brokers for violations. Scott said the measure would make the state “a national outlier and more hostile than any other state to many businesses and non-profits.” Despite overturning several of Scott’s other vetoes, the state’s Democrat-controlled Legislature failed to override his veto of the privacy bill. (ASSOCIATED PRESS)
The New York Legislature passed a bill (SB 7694) that would require social media platforms to provide chronological feeds to minors instead of algorithmically curated feeds. The state’s lawmakers also passed a bill (SB 7695) that would prohibit digital services from collecting the data of minors without consent. (PLURIBUS NEWS, LEXISNEXIS STATE NET)
California lawmakers are taking another pass at legislation (AB 886) that would require online platforms to pay for the news they publish. A similar bill was derailed last year by divisions within the journalism industry and strong opposition from Google and other tech companies. (LOS ANGELES TIMES)
Michigan’s House passed a bill (HB 5570) banning the creation, publication or distribution of deep fake sexual images without the consent of the individuals represented in the images. Last year the state enacted laws restricting the use of artificial intelligence in political campaigns and requiring disclosure when it is used. (DETROIT NEWS)
—Compiled by SNCJ Managing Editor KOREY CLARK
As we’ve previously reported, most states have either introduced or enacted legislation related to AI in the past twelve months. AI continues to be a pressing issue for state lawmakers this year, potentially introducing a host of challenges for businesses. And we don’t foresee that changing any time soon. That is why LexisNexis® State Net® would like to offer you 30 days of AI legislative and regulatory alerts for free.*
Sign up here to Start Receiving Alerts
Disclaimer: LexisNexis® State Net® AI Alert Feed offer is limited to the individual addressee specifically selected for this promotion and is void where prohibited by law or by your employer’s policies. Individual must be a government affairs, legal or compliance professional. Offer expires December 31, 2024. Other restrictions may apply.
Visit our webpage to connect with a LexisNexis® State Net® representative and learn how the State Net legislative and regulatory tracking service can help you identify, track, analyze and report on relevant legislative and regulatory developments.