Texas v. DHS Majority: "We address whether United States Border Patrol agents can legally cut a concertina wire (“c-wire” or “wire”) fence the State of Texas has placed along...
USCIS, Nov. 27, 2024 "The Department of Homeland Security (DHS) and the Department of Labor (DOL) issued a temporary final rule (TFR) making available an additional 64,716 H-2B temporary nonagricultural...
Michelle N. Méndez, Director of Legal Resources and Training, National Immigration Project reports: "On November 25, 2024, the U.S. District Court for the District of Maryland granted final...
USCIS, Nov. 26, 2024 "The Department of Homeland Security today posted a Federal Register notice designating Lebanon for Temporary Protected Status for 18 months. Secretary of Homeland Security...
TRAC, Nov. 25, 2024 "Wide differences in Immigration Judge asylum denial rates are evident across many Courts in the latest release of TRAC’s Immigration Judge report series. These new reports...
Matter of Khan, 28 I&N Dec. 850 (BIA 2024) Interim Decision #4081, Nov. 1, 2024
(1) When the government must prove the elements of a sentencing enhancement beyond a reasonable doubt, those additional elements are combined with the elements of the underlying criminal statute and all the elements are then considered together as one compound crime.
(2) The respondent’s compound conviction under section 191.5(b) of the California Penal Code enhanced by section 20001(c) of the California Vehicle Code is categorically for a crime involving moral turpitude.
Majority: "We therefore affirm the Immigration Judge’s conclusion that the respondent’s compound conviction under section 191.5(b) of the California Penal Code enhanced by section 20001(c) of the California Vehicle Code is categorically for a crime involving moral turpitude rendering him removable under section 237(a)(2)(A)(i) of the INA, 8 U.S.C. § 1227(a)(2)(A)(i)."
Dissent: "This case presents a complex set of criminal statutes raising difficult questions, and I appreciate the majority’s detailed analysis. However, I cannot agree that the elements of the respondent’s conviction under section 191.5(b) of the California Penal Code, as enhanced by section 20001(c) of the California Vehicle Code, constitute a crime involving moral turpitude. ... I would find DHS’ charges of removability are not proven by clear and convincing evidence and would thus not reach the additional relief issues reached by the majority decision. I would grant the respondent’s motion to terminate removal proceedings."