DOL, July 26, 2024 "On August 7, 2024, the Department of Labor will host a public webinar to educate stakeholders, program users, and other interested members of the public on the changes to the...
Atud v. Garland (unpub.) "Mathurin A. Atud petitions for review of a decision of the Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA) denying his motion to reopen removal proceedings based on alleged ineffective...
Shen v. Garland "Peng Shen, a citizen of the People’s Republic of China, applied for asylum, withholding of removal, and relief under the Convention Against Torture. An Immigration Judge ...
This document is scheduled to be published in the Federal Register on 07/25/2024 "On January 17, 2017, DHS published a final rule with new regulatory provisions guiding the use of parole on a case...
Lance Curtright reports: "After the 5th Circuit’s initial decision in Membreno, [ Membreno-Rodriguez v. Garland, 95 F.4th 219 ] my law partner Paul Hunker (a new AILA member!) reached out to...
EOIR, Apr. 12, 2022
"ISSUES PRESENTED:
1. Whether, in light of U.S. v. Herrold, 941 F.3d 173 (5th Cir. 2019) (en banc), and regardless of the specific mens rea of an underlying crime, the commission or attempted commission of a felony, theft, or an assault under Texas Penal Code § 30.02(a)(3) necessarily supersedes or implicitly contains generic burglary’s intent element, which requires an “intent to commit a crime” upon entry into a building or habitation.
2. Whether the burglary statute under Texas Penal Code § 30.02 covers more conduct than the generic offense of burglary because § 30.02(a)(3) does not on its face require proof of intent to commit a crime at any time or at any point during the offense conduct. See Van Cannon v. United States, 890 F.3d 656 (7th Cir. 2018)
3. Whether the respondent’s conviction for attempted burglary under Texas Penal Code § 30.02 is a “crime of violence” under section 101(a)(43)(F) of the Act that meets the “physical force” element under 18 U.S.C. § 16(a), as defined in Johnson v. United States, 559 U.S. 133, 140 (2010), which neither Chavez-Mercado v. Barr, 946 F.3d 272, 274 n.2 (5th Cir. 2020), nor the cases cited therein addressed."