Use this button to switch between dark and light mode.

CA3 on CIMT: Mahn v. Attorney General

September 17, 2014 (1 min read)

"Emmanuel Mahn petitions for review of his final order of removal and contends that his Pennsylvania conviction for reckless endangerment is not a crime involving moral turpitude (“CIMT”).  Applying the categorical approach, we conclude that the least culpable conduct punishable under Pennsylvania’s reckless endangerment statute does not implicate moral turpitude.  Therefore, we grant Mahn’s petition for review and vacate the BIA’s removal order." - Mahn v. Attorney General, Sept. 17, 2014.  [Hats off to Wayne Sachs!]

Tags: