Use this button to switch between dark and light mode.

CA3 on MPP: E.O.H.C. v. DHS

February 13, 2020 (1 min read)

E.O.H.C. v. DHS

"This case raises the age-old question: “If not now, when?” Mishnah, Pirkei Avot 1:14. For aliens who are challenging their removal from the United States, the answer is usually “later.” But not always. And not here. ...  If “later” is not an option, review is available now. Appellants E.O.H.C. and M.S.H.S., his seven-year-old daughter, came from Guatemala through Mexico to the United States. The Government seeks to return them to Mexico while it decides whether to grant them asylum or instead remove them to Guatemala. They brought several claims in the District Court, challenging the Government’s authority to return them to Mexico. The District Court dismissed all their claims for lack of subject-matter jurisdiction. We see things differently. One claim, involving the statutory right to counsel, arises from the proceedings to remove them to Guatemala, so it can await a petition for review. But the rest of the claims challenge the Government’s plan to return them to Mexico in the meantime. For these claims, review is now or never. So we will affirm in part and reverse and remand in part."

[Hats way off to Anthony Vale, Michael S. DePrince, Tobias Barrington Wolff,Bridget Cambria and Amy Maldonado!]