USCIS, Nov. 14, 2024 "Policy Highlights - Clarifies that for purposes of determining whether an applicant for naturalization meets the requirement of being lawfully admitted to the United States...
USCIS, Nov. 13, 2024 "On November 7, 2024, the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas in State of Texas v. Department of Homeland Security , Case Number 24-cv-306 (E.D.T...
Aleman-Belloso v. Garland "Jose Ernesto Aleman-Belloso (“Aleman”), a native and citizen of El Salvador, petitions for review of a decision by the Board of Immigration Appeals (“BIA”...
USCIS, Nov. 13, 2024 "Policy Highlights • Provides that Afghan nationals who arrived in the United States during OAW and received a full immigration medical examination conducted by a blanket...
Visa Bulletin for December 2024
Chavez Gonzalez v. Garland
"We hold today that the IJs and BIA possess the inherent authority to terminate removal proceedings, abrogating Matter of S-O-G- & F-D-B-. We likewise conclude the BIA improperly denied Petitioner’s request for administrative closure because it failed to address Petitioner’s specific argument based on his DACA status. ... [W]e fail to see how the general power to terminate proceedings is “[in]consistent” with the authorities bestowed by the INA. 8 C.F.R. §§ 1003.10(b), 1003.1(d)(1)(ii). We have found no provisions stating that the IJ or BIA cannot terminate removal proceedings, and the Government does not cite to any. The Attorney General’s decision in Matter of S-O-G- is therefore in conflict with the plain meaning of section 1003.10(b) and 1003.1(d)(1)(ii) and must be abrogated. ... Having decided the IJs and BIA possess the inherent authority to terminate immigration proceedings, we hereby abrogate the Attorney General’s decision in Matter of S-O-G- & F-D-B-, 27 I. & N. Dec. 462 (A.G. 2018). ... [U]pon remand, the BIA must address Petitioner’s DACA-based administrative closure argument."
[Hats way off to Ben Winograd!]