DOL, July 26, 2024 "On August 7, 2024, the Department of Labor will host a public webinar to educate stakeholders, program users, and other interested members of the public on the changes to the...
Atud v. Garland (unpub.) "Mathurin A. Atud petitions for review of a decision of the Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA) denying his motion to reopen removal proceedings based on alleged ineffective...
Shen v. Garland "Peng Shen, a citizen of the People’s Republic of China, applied for asylum, withholding of removal, and relief under the Convention Against Torture. An Immigration Judge ...
This document is scheduled to be published in the Federal Register on 07/25/2024 "On January 17, 2017, DHS published a final rule with new regulatory provisions guiding the use of parole on a case...
Lance Curtright reports: "After the 5th Circuit’s initial decision in Membreno, [ Membreno-Rodriguez v. Garland, 95 F.4th 219 ] my law partner Paul Hunker (a new AILA member!) reached out to...
AMICUS INVITATION No. 23-15-02
AMICUS INVITATION (Office of the Chief Administrative Hearing Officer – Immigration-related Document Fraud)
DUE FEBRUARY 27, 2023
FEBRUARY 15, 2023 In connection with an administrative review of an Administrative Law Judge decision, the Chief Administrative Hearing Officer (CAHO) welcomes interested members of the public to file amicus curiae briefs discussing the below issue.
ISSUE PRESENTED: Does a violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1324c(a)(2) for the knowing use of a forged, counterfeit, altered, or falsely made document in order to obtain employment and complete the employment eligibility verification Form I-9 constitute a “continuing violation” for the duration of employment at the employer to whom the document was presented? Or, does the knowing use occur only at the time the document is presented to obtain employment and complete the employment eligibility verification Form I-9? ... [Continued...]