Interim Guidance: Civil Immigration Enforcement Actions in or near Courthouses "This memorandum provides interim guidance governing U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) civil immigration...
DOJ, Jan. 21, 2025 - Interim Policy Changes Regarding Charging, Sentencing and Immigration Enforcement
This document is scheduled to be published in the Federal Register on 01/24/2025 "This Notice rescinds the March 21, 2022 Notice, Rescission of the Notice of July 23, 2019, Designation for Expedited...
On Jan. 20, 2025 President Trump issued the executive actions related to immigration linked below: https://www.whitehouse.gov/presidential-actions/2025/01/guaranteeing-the-states-protection-against-invasion...
American Immigration Council (Council) and the National Immigration Project, Jan. 17, 2025 "A stay of removal prevents the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) from executing a final order of removal...
Nash v. Mikesell
"A division of the court of appeals considers whether Colorado law prohibits state or local law enforcement officers from performing the arrest and detention functions of federal immigration officers under an agreement executed pursuant to 8 U.S.C. § 1357(g). The division concludes that the agreement violates Colorado law. Specifically, it concludes that state or local law enforcement officers are prohibited from arresting and detaining individuals otherwise eligible for release under Colorado law on the basis of a civil immigration detainer as defined under section 24-76.6-101(1), C.R.S. 2023. ... At issue in this appeal is whether certain activities carried out under TCSO’s 287(g) agreement (TCSO’s Agreement) with ICE are prohibited by sections 24-76.6-101 and -102, C.R.S. 2023, or article II, sections 7 and 19 of the Colorado Constitution. We conclude that sections 24-76.6-101 and -102 prohibit the arrests and detentions purportedly authorized by TCSO’s Agreement. ... [R]emand is appropriate for the district court to make detailed findings and conclusions regarding whether plaintiffs have met their burden for a permanent injunction."