DOL, July 26, 2024 "On August 7, 2024, the Department of Labor will host a public webinar to educate stakeholders, program users, and other interested members of the public on the changes to the...
Atud v. Garland (unpub.) "Mathurin A. Atud petitions for review of a decision of the Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA) denying his motion to reopen removal proceedings based on alleged ineffective...
Shen v. Garland "Peng Shen, a citizen of the People’s Republic of China, applied for asylum, withholding of removal, and relief under the Convention Against Torture. An Immigration Judge ...
This document is scheduled to be published in the Federal Register on 07/25/2024 "On January 17, 2017, DHS published a final rule with new regulatory provisions guiding the use of parole on a case...
Lance Curtright reports: "After the 5th Circuit’s initial decision in Membreno, [ Membreno-Rodriguez v. Garland, 95 F.4th 219 ] my law partner Paul Hunker (a new AILA member!) reached out to...
"The [government's] petition for rehearing en banc is granted. In accordance with customary practice, the panel opinion [769 F.3d 32] released on October 6, 2014 is withdrawn, and the judgment entered on the same date is vacated. ... The parties have filed briefs and the en banc court will have copies of those briefs. A further order will issue in due course to determine what supplemental briefs, if any, are required or permitted." - Castañeda v. Souza, Jan. 23, 2015.
"Because § 1226(c) only applies to aliens detained “when . . . released” from criminal custody, and because the petitioners were not timely detained under any reasonable interpretation of the statute, we conclude that the petitioners are not subject to mandatory detention under § 1226(c) and are entitled to an individualized bail hearing under § 1226(a). We therefore affirm the district court’s grant of habeas corpus relief in each case." - Castañeda v. Souza, Oct. 6, 2014.