IMMpact Litigation, Apr. 25, 2024 "IMMpact Litigation, seeking redress for over 100,000 Ukrainian nationals paroled into the United States post-February 2022, today announces a significant advancement...
DOL, Apr. 26, 2024 "The Department of Labor today announced a final rule to strengthen protections for farmworkers . The rule targets vulnerability and abuses experienced by workers under the H...
NILA, Apr. 24, 2024 "The National Immigration Litigation Alliance (NILA) and Innovation Law Lab are thrilled to announce that, in response to the lawsuit we filed against the United States Citizenship...
NILA, Apr. 24, 2024 "Today, three immigration attorneys and two individuals filed a prospective class action lawsuit in federal court, challenging U.S. Customs and Border Protection’s (CBP...
USCIS, Apr. 23, 2024 "U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) today announced the upcoming opening of international field offices in Doha, Qatar, and Ankara, Turkey, to increase capacity...
Hats off to Prof. Hiroko Kusuda for her victory in New Orleans Immigration Court! IJ Eric Marsteller distinguished Jaco v. Garland, stating: "The Fifth Circuit in Jaco v. Garland suggested that "Honduran women" is not sufficiently particular. 16 F.4th 1169, 1181 (5th Cir. 2021). The particular social group of "Honduran women" was not at issue in Jaco, however, and the Fifth Circuit's comment related to this group was incidental to the disposition of the case. See id. Therefore, the Fifth Circuit's comment regarding "Honduran women" as a particular social group is dicta and is not binding on this Court's decision. See id. The Court also finds that the facts in Jaco are distinguishable from the facts in Respondent's case, such that Jaco does not directly apply. ... As Respondent has demonstrated that she experienced past persecution, and she has an unrebutted well-founded fear of future persecution, she has proven she qualifies as a refugee under the INA and established her eligibility for asylum. INA § 101 (a)( 42)(A). The Court further finds that Respondent warrants a favorable exercise of discretion and therefore will grant her application for asylum." ICE did not appeal.