Tian v. Bondi "Petitioner Shuqiang Tian (“Tian”), a native and citizen of the People’s Republic of China (“China”), seeks review of a January 6, 2022, decision of the...
Lau v. Bondi "We cannot agree with Valenzuela-Felix ’s interpretation of the relevant provisions of the INA. ... [W]e conclude that the agency erred in finding Lau removable pursuant to section...
ACLU So. Cal., Feb. 26, 2025 "Today, in response to brazen and unlawful raids by federal agents in the Central Valley last month, the United Farm Workers (UFW) and five Kern County residents sued...
BIB Daily presents monthly PERM practice tips from Ron Wada , member of the Editorial Board for Bender’s Immigration Bulletin and author of the 10+ year series of BALCA review articles, “Shaping...
EOIR, Feb. 28, 2025 "Beginning in 2021, EOIR engaged in a number of questionable and problematic personnel practices concerning adjudicators that called its integrity, credibility, and impartiality...
Russell Abrutyn writes: "The BIA granted a second motion to reopen and remanded for further consideration of the respondent's eligibility for cancellation of removal as a permanent resident. In reopening, the BIA noted the ineffective assistance of counsel the respondent received, the abuse she suffered as reflected in the approval of her VAWA I-751 petition, and the improvements she made in her life once she left the abusive relationship. The respondent was represented by Russell Abrutyn and Marshal E. Hyman."