TRAC, Apr. 2024 "At the end of March 2024, 3,524,051 active cases were pending before the Immigration Court."
Sanchez-Perez v. Garland "One day after he pleaded guilty to violating a Tennessee domestic-violence law, the federal government initiated removal proceedings against Jose Yanel Sanchez-Perez. Ultimately...
In a letter dated April 12, 2024 the State Department and USCIS discuss "concerns about biometrics collection for applicants for T nonimmigrant status and petitioners for U nonimmigrant status abroad...
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 84 / Tuesday, April 30, 2024 "This final rule adopts and replaces regulations relating to key aspects of the placement, care, and services provided to unaccompanied...
Bouarfa v. Mayorkas Issue: Whether a visa petitioner may obtain judicial review when an approved petition is revoked on the basis of nondiscretionary criteria. Case below: 75 F.4th 1157 (11th Cir....
Matter of X-, Nov. 22, 2023
"The Immigration Judge found the respondent was convicted of possession of a controlled substance for sale, to wit: methamphetamine, in violation of section 11378 of the California Health and Safety Code (IJ at 3-4, Mar. 2, 2023). ... The respondent filed a motion to reconsider the Immigration Judge’s decision, arguing that geometric isomers of methamphetamine can exist and presenting a declaration from an organic chemistry professor. DHS opposed the motion, arguing that the evidence presented by the respondent was contradicted by the expert testimony provided in Rodriguez-Gamboa. The Immigration Judge granted the respondent’s motion to reconsider and terminated her removal proceedings (IJ at 2-3, Mar. 15, 2023). ... Based on the evidence in the record, the Immigration Judge’s finding that geometric isomers can exist is not clearly erroneous (IJ at 3, Mar. 15, 2023). ... We agree with the Immigration Judge that the respondent’s conviction is not categorically an aggravated felony drug trafficking offense. DHS does not argue that California’s definition of methamphetamine is divisible with respect to geometric versus optical isomers. Therefore, DHS has not satisfied its burden of proving by clear and convincing evidence that the respondent has been convicted of an aggravated felony and is removable as charged. See 8 C.F.R. § 1240.8(a).Accordingly, the following order will be entered. ORDER: DHS’ appeal is dismissed."
[Hats way off to Laura Shoaps!]