Perez Parra et al. v. Dora Castro "It is HEREBY ORDERED that Respondents and their officers, agents, servants, employees, attorneys, and any other persons who are in active concert or participation...
Intersections with Dr. Russell " Intersections with Dr. Russell , is a bi-weekly podcast tackling immigration through storytelling, data, and myth-busting—all through the lens of a Black immigrant...
New Hampshire ACLU, Feb. 10, 2025 "A federal court in New Hampshire today blocked President Trump’s executive order that seeks to strip certain babies born in the United States of their U...
White House, Feb. 7, 2025 - Addressing Egregious Actions of The Republic of South Africa Austin Kocher, Ph.D., has an explainer here . Afrikaners say, "Thanks, but no thanks."
LexisNexis, Feb. 6, 2025 - "LexisNexis® Legal & Professional, a leading global provider of AI-powered analytics and decision tools, is pleased to announce that Shoba Sivaprasad Wadhia has...
David G. Savage, Los Angeles Times, Feb. 1, 2024
"For more than a century, immigration and border enforcement have been seen as falling exclusively under federal control, and when states tried to exert a greater role, courts shut them down. Texas is now moving to challenge that legal interpretation with the more conservative Supreme Court majority. And the outcome may turn on a lone 2012 dissent by the late conservative Justice Antonin Scalia. ... In December, [Texas Gov. Greg] Abbott signed into law SB 4, a measure that would authorize Texas police and state judges to arrest, detain and deport migrants who are suspected of crossing the border illegally. It was seen as a direct challenge to the 2012 Supreme Court decision that struck down a similar law in the case of Arizona vs. United States. It was that decision which prompted Scalia’s dissent. “This is a frontal assault on the federal primacy in immigration enforcement, and it’s definitely going to the Supreme Court,” said Cornell law professor Stephen Yale-Loehr.