FRANCESCA D’ANNUNZIO and AVERY SCHMITZ, Texas Observer, MAY 23, 2024 "All along the border, a monthslong investigation by the Observer and Arizona Center for Investigative Reporting has found...
Nebraska Chamber Foundation, Jan. 2024 "Workforce is the top competitive issue facing business in America. First, there is a lack of workers with specific skills that has created severe shortages...
DOJ, May 23, 2024 "The Justice Department and the Department of Labor announced today separate agreements with Arthur Grand Technologies Inc. ( Arthur Grand ), an information technology services...
You have the hardcover and/or the ebook. (I have both.) Now buy the paperback! Perchance to DREAM: A Legal and Political History of the DREAM Act and DACA, by Michael A. Olivas Foreword by Bill Richardson...
Cyrus D. Mehta, May 27, 2024 "If Trump gets reelected, he has hinted that his administration will create a deportation force that would deport 15 million undocumented immigrants. Radley Balko’s...
NWIRP, Dec. 13, 2018 - "A federal district court in Seattle, Washington issued an order rejecting the government’s arguments that recent asylum seekers who enter the United States without immigration status are not entitled to constitutional protections. U.S. District Court Judge Marsha J. Pechman denied in part the government’s attempt to dismiss a case which challenges practices that keep asylum seekers locked up in detention for extended periods of time. The suit, brought by four asylum seekers, challenges delays in both credible fear interviews and bond hearings. The plaintiffs are seeking to represent a nationwide class of asylum applicants who are subjected to a prolonged stay in detention while waiting for their initial asylum screenings, and then for their bond hearings in front of an immigration judge. All four plaintiffs were detained for six to eight weeks before they were finally given an interview with an asylum officer. They then faced additional delays in detention before they received bond hearings. The lawsuit also challenges the government’s denial of procedural safeguards in the bond hearings, including the practice of placing the burden of providing eligibility for release on the detained asylum seekers in the bond hearings, the failure to provide transcripts or recordings of the bond hearings, and the failure to provide individualized findings in bond decisions. The lawsuit was brought in response to the Trump administration’s family separation and detention policies targeting asylum seekers. Plaintiffs are represented by Northwest Immigrant Rights Project (NWIRP) and the American Immigration Council (the Council). “The order makes clear that our Plaintiffs have the right to seek this Court’s intervention to enforce their constitutional rights as they seek protection in this country,” said Matt Adams, legal director for NWIRP. “We can now move forward seeking relief from the government’s actions imposing arbitrary and prolonged detention on asylum seekers.” “The government continues to subject asylum seekers to weeks or more of unnecessary detention while they pursue their lawful claims. We are pleased that Judge Pechman rejected the government’s attempt to stop the Court from considering Plaintiffs’ challenges to these unlawful practices,” said Trina Realmuto, directing attorney for the Council. The order can be found here. Plaintiffs’ motions for class certification and for preliminary injunctive relief with respect to the bond hearings remain pending before the Court."