Maria Ramirez Uribe, PolitiFact, Oct. 3, 2024 "Temporary Protected Status and humanitarian parole do not provide people a pathway to citizenship. So, people with humanitarian parole or Temporary...
CMS: The Untold Story: Migrant Deaths Along the US-Mexico Border and Beyond October 16, 2024 01:00 PM - 02:00 PM (ET) The Journal on Migration and Human Security will soon release a special edition...
Angelo Paparelli, Manish Daftari, Oct. 3, 2024 "Recent developments have upended many of our earlier predictions of the likely post-election immigration landscape in the United States. These include...
Reece Jones, Oct. 2, 2024 "“Open borders” has become an epithet that Republican use to attack Democrats, blaming many problems in the United States on the lack of attention to the border...
UCLA Law, Oct. 1, 2024 "Today, a UCLA alumnus and a university lecturer, represented by attorneys from the law firm of Altshuler Berzon LLP, Organized Power in Numbers , and the Center for Immigration...
Representative Gilbert R. Cisneros, Jr. (CA-39), Sept. 12, 2019
"Today, Representative Gilbert R. Cisneros, Jr. (CA-39), member of the House Armed Services Committee, along with Representatives Veronica Escobar (TX-07), and Salud Carbajal (CA-24), led a letter to Secretary of Defense Mark Esper and Acting Secretary of the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) Kevin McAleenan seeking answers regarding Department of Defense (DoD) policy on the process for non-citizen servicemembers seeking naturalization and how the Department of Homeland Security, specifically the U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS), evaluates servicemember applications for naturalization.
In 2017, DoD issued a memorandum outlining several changes to the certification process for military servicemembers seeking naturalization. The drop in the number of servicemembers applying for and earning U.S. citizenship in recent years raises serious concerns that policies by these agencies may be impeding those who have put their lives on the line to defend our nation from seeking and attaining naturalization.
“We are puzzled by what we have found in the U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services’ (USCIS) data. In the second quarter of fiscal year 2019, USCIS denied 17.6 percent of military applications for citizenship—more than 6 percent higher than the 11 percent civilian application denial rate. The report marks an increase from the first quarter fiscal year 2019 denial rate for military applicants and it is the seventh quarterly report out of the last nine that has noted a higher rate of denial for military applicants than civilian applicants,” wrote the lawmakers.
They continued, “We are baffled that those servicemembers who volunteered to protect and defend the United States and fulfilled the requirements outlined in the DoD policy memorandum, to include honorable service and honorable discharge, would be denied at a rate higher than the civilian population seeking U.S. citizenship.”
Joining the lawmakers leading the letter are: Representatives Julia Brownley (CA-26), Cheri Bustos (IL-17), Tony Cárdenas (CA-29), André Carson (IN-07), Bonnie Watson Coleman (NJ-12), Gerald E. Connolly (VA-11), Jim Costa (CA-16), Charlie Crist (FL-13), Jason Crow (CO-06), Henry Cuellar (TX-28), Sharice L. Davids (KS-03), Danny K. Davis (IL-07), Adriano Espaillat (NY-13), Bill Foster (IL-11), Ruben Gallego (AZ-07), John Garamendi (CA-03), Jesús G. "Chuy" García (IL-04), Raúl M. Grijalva (AZ-03), James A. Himes (CT-04), Chrissy Houlahan (PA-06), Rick Larsen (WA-02), Barbara Lee (CA-13), Alan Lowenthal (CA-47), Tom Malinowski (NJ-07), James P. McGovern (MA-02), Grace Meng (NY-06), Grace F. Napolitano (CA-32), Eleanor Holmes Norton (D-DC), Scott H. Peters (CA-52), Max Rose (NY-11), Bobby L. Rush (IL-01), Jan Schakowsky (IL-09), Terri A. Sewell (AL-07), Mikie Sherrill (NJ-11), Abigail D. Spanberger (VA-07), Jackie Speier (CA-14), Haley Stevens (MI-11), Mark Takano (CA-41), Dina Titus (NV-01), Paul D. Tonko (NY-20), Xochitl Torres Small (NM-02), Lori Trahan (MA-03), Juan Vargas (CA-51), and Marc Veasey (TX-33).
The full text of the letter can be found below and downloaded here.
###
Dear Secretary Esper and Acting Secretary McAleenan:
We write to request further information regarding the process by which non-citizen servicemembers, including lawful permanent residents (LPRs), may seek naturalization and the adjudication of their applications. The precipitous drop in the number of servicemembers applying for and earning U.S. citizenship in recent years raises serious concerns that policies by your agencies may be impeding those who have put their lives on the line to defend our nation from seeking and attaining naturalization.
Regarding the process by which non-citizen servicemembers, including LPRs, may seek naturalization, we are aware that the Department of Defense (DoD) issued a policy memorandum in 2017 outlining several changes to the certification process for military servicemembers seeking naturalization. Of course, we recognize the importance of addressing potential counterintelligence threats and related national security concerns—and we appreciate DoD’s efforts to ensure the security of any recruitment pathway. However, media reports suggest that the new policy has had a chilling effect—unit leaders that would have previously provided assistance or guidance for servicemembers filling out required paperwork to apply for naturalization are no longer doing so. Our concern, therefore, is principally focused on ensuring non-citizen servicemembers, including LPRs, are aware of what is required to seek naturalization and the resources available to them to that end. We believe that where there are non-citizen servicemembers serving honorably in the U.S. Armed Forces, there should be a clear and efficient process to seek certification for such honorable service and, ultimately, naturalization.
Turning to the review of naturalization applications, we are puzzled by what we have found in the U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services’ (USCIS) data. In the second quarter of fiscal year 2019, USCIS denied 17.6 percent of military applications for citizenship—more than 6 percent higher than the 11 percent civilian application denial rate. The report marks an increase from the first quarter fiscal year 2019 denial rate for military applicants (16.6 percent) and it is the seventh quarterly report out of the last nine that has noted a higher rate of denial for military applicants than civilian applicants. We are baffled that those servicemembers who volunteered to protect and defend the United States and fulfilled the requirements outlined in the DoD policy memorandum, to include honorable service and honorable discharge, would be denied at a rate higher than the civilian population seeking U.S. citizenship.
In order to better understand how DoD implements the policy outlined in the 2017 memorandum and the criteria by which USCIS evaluates servicemember applications for citizenship, we request your responses to the following questions:
For DoD:
For USCIS:
Thank you for your time and attention to this matter. We look forward to your response."