By Chuan Qin and Adam Mills Masarek1 Los Angeles Superior Court has long served as one of the nation’s busiest and most influential trial courts. Over the last several years, however, one category...
For legal teams evaluating federal agency action, the Administrative Procedure Act, or APA, is a foundational statute. Often searched as “what is the administrative procedures act,” the APA...
Results from the Lex Machina ® 2026 Impact of Legal Analytics Survey show how deeply analytics have influenced modern litigation practice. In a survey of 207 law firm professionals in the U.S., respondents...
Commercial contract litigation arises when parties to a business agreement cannot resolve alleged breaches through negotiation or alternative dispute resolution. These disputes may involve payment disagreements...
April 11th marks the anniversary of the enactment of the Civil Rights Act of 1968, also known as the Federal Fair Housing Act (FHA). Since its enactment and through its amendments, the FHA has expressly...
* The views expressed in externally authored materials linked or published on this site do not necessarily reflect the views of LexisNexis Legal & Professional.
The Lex Machina team is excited to launch expanded Legal Analytics for litigation involving claims brought pursuant to the First Amendment, Religious Freedom Restoration Act (RFRA), and Religious Land Use and Institutionalized Persons Act (RLUIPA) (the “First Amendment Cases”). Consisting of more than 40,000 cases, the First Amendment Cases give practitioners critical insights on judges, courts, law firms, attorneys, and parties involved in litigation under the relevant statutes.
This release marks the final stage in Lex Machina’s achievement of full civil rights coverage. The First Amendment Cases join the civil rights datasets already available on the platform:
The First Amendment Cases bring our total civil rights cases to over 240,000 and our total federal district court cases to over 3.7 million. We are proud of this key achievement in completing our civil rights coverage.
The full civil rights dataset incorporates notable features such as filters for each subsection of cases. It also incorporates an extensive collection of practice-area specific damages, remedies, and findings. Here are a few of the findings specific to the subsets of civil rights cases offered by Lex Machina:
With the recently released First Amendment Cases, our research uncovered the following data trends for those First Amendment Cases filed between January 1, 2009 and December 31, 2023:
Lex Machina allows users to filter by a multitude of parameters, including the following, in order to find the most relevant cases:
Case Tags – ADA; ADA High-Volume Plaintiff; ADA: Auditory / Visual Accommodation; ADA: Mobility Accommodation; ADA: Service Animal Accommodation; ADA: Website Access Accommodation; Education; Fair Housing Act; First Amendment; Police Action; Voting
Remedies – Granted and Denied Permanent Injunction; Preliminary Injunction; Temporary Restraining Order; ADA Remediation; Non-ADA Remediation
Damages – Civil Penalties; Compensatory Damages; Nominal Damages; Punitive Damages; State Statutory Damages
Depending on your subscription, users can access the analytics on First Amendment Cases now.
To learn more, contact our sales team.