LexisNexis has selected some recently issued noteworthy IMR decisions that illustrate the criteria that must be met to obtain authorization for a variety of different medical treatment modalities. LexisNexis...
By Hon. Susan V. Hamilton, Former Assistant Secretary and Deputy Commissioner, California Workers’ Compensation Appeals Board Appeals Board panel decisions that rescind a WCJ’s decision and...
Board Panel Opinion Provides a Succinct Explanation By Hon. Susan V. Hamilton, Former Assistant Secretary and Deputy Commissioner, California Workers’ Compensation Appeals Board The process for...
CALIFORNIA COMPENSATION CASES Vol. 89, No. 4 April 2024 A Report of En Banc and Significant Panel Decisions of the WCAB and Selected Court Opinions of Related Interest, With a Digest of WCAB Decisions...
By Hon. Susan V. Hamilton, Former Assistant Secretary and Deputy Commissioner, California Workers’ Compensation Appeals Board Several months ago, an article in LexisNexis Workers’ Compensation...
Where a taxi driver sustained work-related injuries in a vehicular accident and subsequently settled his third-party tort action against the other driver’s estate for the policy limits of that driver’s auto insurance policy without obtaining written approval from the employer, it was appropriate for the Workers’ Compensation Board to dismiss the driver’s workers' compensation claim under Alaska Stat. § 23.30.015(h). The Court also was not persuaded by the driver’s argument that the employer had not been prejudiced.
Thomas A. Robinson, J.D., the Feature National Columnist for the LexisNexis Workers’ Compensation eNewsletter, is co-author of Larson’s Workers’ Compensation Law (LexisNexis).
LexisNexis Online Subscribers: Citations below link to Lexis Advance.
See Atkins v. Inlet Transp. & Taxi Serv., 2018 Alas. LEXIS 144 (Sept. 21, 2018)
See generally Larson’s Workers’ Compensation Law, § 116.07.
Source: Larson’s Workers’ Compensation Law, the nation’s leading authority on workers’ compensation law