Oakland, CA – A California Workers’ Compensation Institute (CWCI) review of the initial report on fiscal year (FY) 2023/24 California workers’ compensation public self-insured data shows...
Oakland, CA – New data from the California Workers’ Compensation Institute (CWCI) shows recent shifts in the types of drugs prescribed to injured workers in California, and in the distribution...
Oakland, CA – The Board of Directors of the California Workers’ Compensation Institute (CWCI) has named the Institute’s Chief Operating Officer, Gideon L. Baum, to succeed Alex Swedlow...
Here’s an interesting writ denied case regarding the issue of when stipulations may be set aside and when they may not. We’ll be reporting this case in the upcoming January 2025 issue of California...
By Hon. Colleen Casey, Former Commissioner, California Workers’ Compensation Appeals Board “Three’s a Crowd” in QME Panel Selection In the case of Hobbs v. N. Valley Elecs....
Construing Texas law, a federal district court has held that an employee of a “non-subscribing employer” under the Texas Workers’ Compensation Act could maintain a negligence action against the employer following a slip and fall incident as the employee attempted to retrieve shopping carts in the employer’s icy parking lot. The employer contended the employee could not maintain the action, but rather was limited to filing a premises liability claim. The distinction was important; since the employer was a “non-subscriber” it could not utilize common law defenses, such as contributory negligence or assumption of the risk in any negligence action. If the injured employee were required to proceed under the premises liability theory, those defenses would have been available. The district court, after providing a thorough review of the applicable case law from Texas, held that here the employee could sue in negligence. Since the employer had raised no other defenses, the court granted plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment.
Thomas A. Robinson, J.D., the Feature National Columnist for the LexisNexis Workers’ Compensation eNewsletter, is a leading commentator and expert on the law of workers’ compensation.
LexisNexis Online Subscribers: Citations below link to Lexis Advance. Bracketed citations link to lexis.com.
See Odom v. Kroger Texas, L.P., 2014 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 18682 (N.D. Tex., Feb. 14, 2014) [2014 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 18682 (N.D. Tex., Feb. 14, 2014)]
See generally Larson’s Workers’ Compensation Law, § 102.01 [102.01]
Source: Larson’s Workers’ Compensation Law, the nation’s leading authority on workers’ compensation law.
For more information about LexisNexis products and solutions connect with us through our corporate site
_____________________________________________________________________
Price $99*; Books shipping now to customers!
Keep track of how the workers' comp landscape is changing with this 400+ page compendium. Here's what you get:
View the brochure & table of contents.
View sample pages.
Order online or contact Christine Hyatt at ph. 937-247-8166, or Email: Christine.E.Hyatt@lexisnexis.com.
*Price does not include sales tax, shipping or handling. Price subject to change without notice.