By Hon. Colleen Casey, Former Commissioner, California Workers’ Compensation Appeals Board “Three’s a Crowd” in QME Panel Selection In the case of Hobbs v. N. Valley Elecs....
By Christopher Mahon, LexisNexis Legal Insights Contributing Author A study published in July 2024 by Occupational and Environmental Medicine analyzed U.S. workers’ compensation claims for mild...
LexisNexis has selected some of the top “noteworthy” panel decisions issued by the California Workers’ Compensation Appeals Board during the period June through December 2024. Several...
CALIFORNIA COMPENSATION CASES Vol. 89, No. 12 December 2024 A Report of En Banc and Significant Panel Decisions of the WCAB and Selected Court Opinions of Related Interest, with a Digest of WCAB Decisions...
LexisNexis has selected some recently issued noteworthy IMR decisions that illustrate the criteria that must be met to obtain authorization for a variety of different medical treatment modalities. LexisNexis...
A federal district court, sitting in Illinois, held that in as much as a retaliatory discharge action in Illinois is created by the state’s Workers’ Compensation Act [see 820 Ill. Comp. Stat. Ann. § 305/4(h)], such a civil action may not be removed to federal court on the basis of diversity of citizenship. The employer had contended that the plaintiff’s tort action only had a “gloss” of workers’ compensation law and that since Illinois case law allowed the imposition of punitive damages the case could be removed. The district court disagreed and observed that, in general, no civil action arising under the workers’ compensation laws of a state could be removed.
Thomas A. Robinson, J.D., the Feature National Columnist for the LexisNexis Workers’ Compensation eNewsletter, is the co-author of Larson’s Workers’ Compensation Law (LexisNexis).
LexisNexis Online Subscribers: Citations below link to Lexis Advance. Bracketed citations link to lexis.com.
See Craig v. Ford Motor Co., 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 139554 (N.D. Ill. Oct. 14, 2015) [2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 139554 (N.D. Ill. Oct. 14, 2015)]
See generally Larson’s Workers’ Compensation Law, § 104.07 [104.07]
For a more detailed discussion of the case, see http://www.workcompwriter.com/illinois-retaliatory-discharge-claim-may-not-be-removed-to-federal-court/
Source: Larson’s Workers’ Compensation Law, the nation’s leading authority on workers’ compensation law.