LexisNexis has selected some recently issued noteworthy IMR decisions that illustrate the criteria that must be met to obtain authorization for a variety of different medical treatment modalities. LexisNexis...
By Christopher Mahon, LexisNexis Legal Insights Contributing Author A September 2024 study from the Workers Compensation Research Institute indicates that workers represented by an attorney in workers’...
By Hon. Colleen Casey, Former Commissioner, California Workers’ Compensation Appeals Board “Substantial Medical Evidence” is a ubiquitous catch-all phrase. When does it exist? When...
CALIFORNIA COMPENSATION CASES Vol. 90, No. 1 January 2025 A Report of En Banc and Significant Panel Decisions of the WCAB and Selected Court Opinions of Related Interest, with a Digest of WCAB Decisions...
By Hon. Colleen Casey, Former Commissioner, California Workers’ Compensation Appeals Board Cases of “first impression” seldom wander into our workers’ compensation world. When...
It is axiomatic in Massachusetts—and the significant majority of other American jurisdictions—that an employer may not retaliate against an employee who sustains a work-related injury. The protections afforded under the Bay State’s retaliatory discharge statute [Mass. Gen. Laws ch. 152, § 75B(2)] go even further than similar statutes in other states, at least according to a recent decision by a state appellate court. Not only may an employer not retaliate against a worker because he or she filed a workers' compensation claim, it may not retaliate against a worker who has filed a third-party tort action against the employer. The court reasoned that the right to sue the employer was not grounded so much in common law as it was in the state's Workers' Compensation Act.
Thomas A. Robinson, J.D., the Feature National Columnist for the LexisNexis Workers’ Compensation eNewsletter, is co-author of Larson’s Workers’ Compensation Law (LexisNexis).
LexisNexis Online Subscribers: Citations below link to Lexis Advance.
See Bermudez v. Dielectrics, Inc., 94 Mass. App. Ct. 491 (Nov. 16, 2018)
See generally Larson’s Workers’ Compensation Law, § 104.07.
Source: Larson’s Workers’ Compensation Law, the nation’s leading authority on workers’ compensation law
For a more detailed discussion of the case, See