LexisNexis has selected some recently issued noteworthy IMR decisions that illustrate the criteria that must be met to obtain authorization for a variety of different medical treatment modalities. LexisNexis...
By Christopher Mahon, LexisNexis Legal Insights Contributing Author A September 2024 study from the Workers Compensation Research Institute indicates that workers represented by an attorney in workers’...
By Hon. Colleen Casey, Former Commissioner, California Workers’ Compensation Appeals Board “Substantial Medical Evidence” is a ubiquitous catch-all phrase. When does it exist? When...
CALIFORNIA COMPENSATION CASES Vol. 90, No. 1 January 2025 A Report of En Banc and Significant Panel Decisions of the WCAB and Selected Court Opinions of Related Interest, with a Digest of WCAB Decisions...
By Hon. Colleen Casey, Former Commissioner, California Workers’ Compensation Appeals Board Cases of “first impression” seldom wander into our workers’ compensation world. When...
Finding that the risk of being tripped while at a doctor's office for treatment of a work-related exposure to an insecticide was a risk to which the employee was equally exposed outside her employment, a Missouri appellate court affirmed a decision by the state's LIRC denying workers' compensation benefits for an alleged aggravation claim. The underlying facts were quite bizarre. Following a work-related exposure to cypermethrin, an insecticide, the employee was sent to an emergency medical facility, after which she returned to work. When she continued to have breathing issues, she was referred to a pulmonary specialist. The employee sat in the specialist's waiting room near another patient who had a small dog with her. As the employee was being called back for the examination, the dog got loose and, in an effort to divert the dog from the employee's path, the doctor accidentally kicked the employee in the leg, causing her to fall. An ALJ found the fall and ensuing injuries were the “natural and probable consequence of” the cypermethrin exposure. The Commission reversed, however, finding that the employee failed to meet her burden of proving her cypermethrin exposure was the “prevailing or primary factor” in causing her injury at the doctor's office. The appellate court agreed.
Thomas A. Robinson, J.D., the Feature National Columnist for the LexisNexis Workers’ Compensation eNewsletter, is co-author of Larson’s Workers’ Compensation Law (LexisNexis).
LexisNexis Online Subscribers: Citations below link to Lexis Advance.
See Schoen v. Mid-Missouri Mental Health Ctr., 2020 Mo. LEXIS 127 (Apr. 14, 2020)
See generally Larson’s Workers’ Compensation Law, § 10.07.
Source: Larson’s Workers’ Compensation Law, the nation’s leading authority on workers’ compensation law
For a more detailed discussion of the case, see
Sign up for the free LexisNexis Workers’ Compensation enewsletter at www.lexisnexis.com/wcnews.