Appeals Board panel revisits Hardesty By Hon. Susan V. Hamilton, Former Assistant Secretary and Deputy Commissioner, California Workers’ Compensation Appeals Board One of the first lessons learned...
CALIFORNIA COMPENSATION CASES Vol. 89, No. 5 May 2024 A Report of En Banc and Significant Panel Decisions of the WCAB and Selected Court Opinions of Related Interest, With a Digest of WCAB Decisions...
By Hon. Susan V. Hamilton, Former Assistant Secretary and Deputy Commissioner, California Workers’ Compensation Appeals Board The medically related intricacies of a California workers’ compensation...
LexisNexis has selected some recently issued noteworthy IMR decisions that illustrate the criteria that must be met to obtain authorization for a variety of different medical treatment modalities. LexisNexis...
By Hon. Susan V. Hamilton, Former Assistant Secretary and Deputy Commissioner, California Workers’ Compensation Appeals Board Appeals Board panel decisions that rescind a WCJ’s decision and...
As is the case in a number of states, in Nebraska, if a workers' compensation case involves a preexisting condition, the claimant must prove that the claimed injury or disability was caused by the claimant's employment and that it was not merely the natural progression of a condition present before the employment [see Neb. Rev. Stat. § 48-151(4). Construing that and other provisions of the state’s Act, the Supreme Court of Nebraska recently affirmed the compensation court’s dismissal of a claim for workers’ compensation benefits filed by an employee who claimed he sustained a compensable shoulder injury moving a 300 pound tub containing machine parts. The high court noted that the claimant had complained of shoulder pain for as many as eight years prior to being hired by the employer and, indeed, had been diagnosed with a torn rotator cuff more than two years before he began his work. Quoting Larson’s Workers’ Compensation Law, the Court noted that the claimant could point to no intervening event causing his current condition. Following the 2009 diagnosis, the claimant continued to have the same pain and limitations. There was no error in the compensation court’s conclusion that the claimant’s symptoms were a natural of his original pre-employment injury.
Reported by Thomas A. Robinson, J.D.
LexisNexis Online Subscribers: Citations below link to Lexis Advance. Bracketed citations link to lexis.com.
See Gills v. Nebraska Machine Prods., Inc., 2013 Neb. App. LEXIS 122 (July 9, 2013) [2013 Neb. App. LEXIS 122 (July 9, 2013)].
See generally Larson’s Workers’ Compensation Law, § 9.02 [9.02].
Source: Larson’s Workers’ Compensation Law, the nation’s leading authority on workers’ compensation law
For more information about LexisNexis products and solutions connect with us through our corporate site