Here's an interesting Board panel decision about a long-standing guardian ad litem who continued to represent the applicant after that party reached the age of majority. The WCAB said that the guardian...
Oakland – A new California Workers’ Compensation Institute (CWCI) study finds that average paid losses on California workers’ compensation lost-time claims fell immediately after legislative...
By Thomas A. Robinson, Co-Editor-in-Chief, Workers’ Compensation Emerging Issues Analysis (LexisNexis)
As we move through the third decade of the twenty-first century, the United States remains...
By Hon. Susan V. Hamilton, Former Assistant Secretary and Deputy Commissioner, California Workers’ Compensation Appeals Board
Industrially injured workers in California are entitled to receive...
CALIFORNIA COMPENSATION CASES
Vol. 88, No. 9 September 2023
A Report of En Banc and Significant Panel Decisions of the WCAB and Selected Court Opinions of Related Interest, With a Digest of WCAB Decisions...
The Supreme Court of New Hampshire, in a case of first impression, held that the appropriate test to gauge the compensability of suicide claims should be the so-called “chain-of-causation.” In its ruling, the Court affirmed a ruling by the state’s Compensation Appeals Board that had denied death benefits to the widow of a worker who sustained a work-related injury and had to deal with excruciating pain during a prolonged recovery. The worker left his wife a note indicating he couldn’t continue to deal with his current situation and the future that he thought looked bleak. Construing RSA 281-A:2.XI, which bars benefits if the decedent’s death resulted from a “willful intention to injure himself,” the court said that under some circumstances, a suicide could be compensable since the employer remained liable for subsequent injuries that were the “direct and natural result” of a prior, work-related injury. The Court indicated that it was joining the majority of jurisdictions that applied the “chain-of-causation” test. Applying that test, the Appeals Board had not erred in awarding benefits to the decedent’s widow.
Thomas A. Robinson, J.D., the co-Editor-in-Chief and Feature National Columnist for the LexisNexis Workers’ Compensation eNewsletter, is co-author of Larson’s Workers’ Compensation Law(LexisNexis).
LexisNexis Online Subscribers: Citations below link to Lexis Advance.
See Appeal of Pelmac Indus., 2021 N.H. LEXIS 154 (Oct. 13, 2021)
See generally Larson’s Workers’ Compensation Law, § 38.03.
Source: Larson’s Workers’ Compensation Law, the nation’s leading authority on workers’ compensation law
For a more detailed discussion of the case, see
Sign up for the free LexisNexis Workers’ Compensation enewsletter at www.lexisnexis.com/wcnews.