CALIFORNIA COMPENSATION CASES Vol. 89, No. 10 October 2024 A Report of En Banc and Significant Panel Decisions of the WCAB and Selected Court Opinions of Related Interest, With a Digest of WCAB Decisions...
By Hon. Robert G. Rassp, Presiding Judge, WCAB Los Angeles, California Division of Workers’ Compensation Disclaimer: The material and any opinions contained in this article are solely those of...
Oakland, CA – Migraine Drugs represented less than 1% of all prescriptions dispensed to California injured workers in 2023 but they consumed 4.7% of workers’ compensation drug payments, a nearly...
COMPLEX EMPLOYMENT ISSUES FOR CALIFORNIA WORKERS' COMPENSATION A new softbound supplement to Rassp & Herlick, California Workers’ Compensation Law 284 pages PIN #0006801214509 For...
By Hon. Colleen Casey, Former Commissioner, California Workers’ Compensation Appeals Board Just when you thought the right of “due process” was on the brink of destruction, the legislature...
Where a husband and wife employed a live-in domestic to perform housekeeping and child care duties, but failed to maintain workers’ compensation insurance, it was appropriate for the New York Workers’ Compensation Board to impose an $86,000 penalty pursuant to N.Y. Work. Comp. Law § 26-a(2)(b). The domestic worker filed a claim after she cut her hand on a broken piece of glass while washing dishes. The WCLJ assessed a penalty of $1,000 for each 10-day period of non-compliance. The employers acknowledged that they had failed to secure workers’ compensation insurance, but contended the penalty should have been much less, perhaps as little as $3,000 using an “alternative” method allowed under the statute. The appellate court indicated the employers had, unfortunately, not raised the argument as to the alternate method of computing the penalty before the WCLJ. Nor did they present any testimony with respect to their failure to obtain workers’ compensation coverage. The $86,000 penalty was, therefore, appropriate.
Thomas A. Robinson, J.D., the Feature National Columnist for the LexisNexis Workers’ Compensation eNewsletter, is the co-author of Larson’s Workers’ Compensation Law (LexisNexis).
LexisNexis Online Subscribers: Citations below link to Lexis Advance.
See Matter of Castillo v. Brown, 2017 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4839 (June 15, 2017)
See generally Larson’s Workers’ Compensation Law, § 102.02.
Source: Larson’s Workers’ Compensation Law, the nation’s leading authority on workers’ compensation law
For a more detailed discussion of the case, see