LexisNexis has selected some recently issued noteworthy IMR decisions that illustrate the criteria that must be met to obtain authorization for a variety of different medical treatment modalities. LexisNexis...
Oakland, CA -- The California Department of Industrial Relations (DIR) has issued the 2025 assessments that workers’ compensation insurers are required to collect from policyholders to cover the...
Oakland – Alex Swedlow has announced his plans to retire as President of the Oakland-based California Workers' Compensation Institute (CWCI) effective August 2025. Mr. Swedlow’s retirement...
Oakland - A new California Workers’ Compensation Institute (CWCI) analysis that examines how medical inflation impacts allowable fees under the California workers’ compensation Official Medical...
By Hon. Colleen Casey, Former Commissioner, California Workers’ Compensation Appeals Board It’s a problem. Petitions for Reconsideration (Recon) are losing their way and delaying their arrival...
Acknowledging that an employer may be liable to third parties for indemnification or contribution where the employer’s employee suffers a “grave injury,” as defined by N.Y. Workers Comp. Law § 11, a New York appellate court nevertheless reversed a trial court’s decision and directed the clerk to enter judgment in favor of the employer since there had been no actual showing of any grave injury. According to the court, the evidence indicated that although the injured employee was still being treated by a neurologist some four years after his original work-related injury, the worker went to the specialist’s office just once a month and, when there, only saw a non-physician. More importantly, said the court, the injured employee testified that he was looking for jobs and had obtained his GED. He was also able to drive his vehicle. On that record, there was no proof that the employee had sustained an acquired injury to the brain caused by an external physical force that effected his ability to be employed in any capacity.
Thomas A. Robinson, J.D., the Feature National Columnist for the LexisNexis Workers’ Compensation eNewsletter, is co-author of Larson’s Workers’ Compensation Law (LexisNexis).
LexisNexis Online Subscribers: Citations below link to Lexis Advance.
See Alulema v. ZEV Elec. Corp., 2019 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 175 (1st Dept. Jan. 10, 2019)
See generally Larson’s Workers’ Compensation Law, § 121.03.
Source: Larson’s Workers’ Compensation Law, the nation’s leading authority on workers’ compensation law