Here's an interesting Board panel decision about a long-standing guardian ad litem who continued to represent the applicant after that party reached the age of majority. The WCAB said that the guardian...
Oakland – A new California Workers’ Compensation Institute (CWCI) study finds that average paid losses on California workers’ compensation lost-time claims fell immediately after legislative...
By Thomas A. Robinson, Co-Editor-in-Chief, Workers’ Compensation Emerging Issues Analysis (LexisNexis)
As we move through the third decade of the twenty-first century, the United States remains...
By Hon. Susan V. Hamilton, Former Assistant Secretary and Deputy Commissioner, California Workers’ Compensation Appeals Board
Industrially injured workers in California are entitled to receive...
CALIFORNIA COMPENSATION CASES
Vol. 88, No. 9 September 2023
A Report of En Banc and Significant Panel Decisions of the WCAB and Selected Court Opinions of Related Interest, With a Digest of WCAB Decisions...
A New York appellate court held it was error to apportion an injured worker’s permanent disability based on medical testimony that 10 percent of the impairment was due to a 2009 work-related injury and that the rest was due to a 1981 work-related injury where the worker returned to work after the 1981 injury and performed various duties for some 28 years until the subsequent work-related accident. It made no difference that during the time frame he was symptomatic; to support apportionment, the employer and its carrier were required to show that the earlier injury actually produced a discernable disability. That could not be shown where the worker continued to be fully employed. In addition, evidence indicated the worker had not received medical treatment for the earlier injury during the ensuing period of time.
Thomas A. Robinson, J.D., the Feature National Columnist for the LexisNexis Workers’ Compensation eNewsletter, is a leading commentator and expert on the law of workers’ compensation.
LexisNexis Online Subscribers: Citations below link to Lexis Advance. Bracketed citations link to lexis.com.
See Levitsky v. Garden Time, Inc., 2015 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2570 (3rd Dep't, Mar. 26, 2015)] [2015 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2570 (3rd Dep't, Mar. 26, 2015)]
See generally Larson’s Workers’ Compensation Law, § 90.04 [90.04]
For a more detailed discussion of the case, see http://www.workcompwriter.com/new-york-apportionment-inappropriate-where-1981-injury-remained-symptomatic-but-was-not-disabling/
Source: Larson’s Workers’ Compensation Law, the nation’s leading authority on workers’ compensation law.
For more information about LexisNexis products and solutions connect with us through our corporate site