By Hon. Susan V. Hamilton, Former Assistant Secretary and Deputy Commissioner, California Workers’ Compensation Appeals Board The medically related intricacies of a California workers’ compensation...
LexisNexis has selected some recently issued noteworthy IMR decisions that illustrate the criteria that must be met to obtain authorization for a variety of different medical treatment modalities. LexisNexis...
By Hon. Susan V. Hamilton, Former Assistant Secretary and Deputy Commissioner, California Workers’ Compensation Appeals Board Appeals Board panel decisions that rescind a WCJ’s decision and...
Board Panel Opinion Provides a Succinct Explanation By Hon. Susan V. Hamilton, Former Assistant Secretary and Deputy Commissioner, California Workers’ Compensation Appeals Board The process for...
CALIFORNIA COMPENSATION CASES Vol. 89, No. 4 April 2024 A Report of En Banc and Significant Panel Decisions of the WCAB and Selected Court Opinions of Related Interest, With a Digest of WCAB Decisions...
A 1986 amendment to the Ohio Workers’ Compensation Act’s definition of “injury” to exclude injury or disability “caused primarily by the natural deterioration of tissue, an organ, or part of the body” [Ohio Rev. Code Ann. § 4123.01(C)(2), emphasis added], did not abrogate the long-standing eggshell-claimant rule, held a state appellate court. Accordingly, an employee suffering from preexisting health impairment was entitled to compensation for a subsequent injury precipitated by a specific work-related strain or trauma that would not have injured a normal, healthy person. Here the claimant suffered an acute partial tear of the left quadriceps tendon when she turned her body to maneuver within a loading area. Medical evidence indicated that she had progression of an earlier diagnosed tendinitis condition. It was stipulated that claimant’s turning maneuver would not have injured a normal, healthy person. The court stressed that it was well settled that workers’ compensation law prescribed no standard of physical fitness to which the employee must conform. In spite of the 1986 amendment, courts had continued to adhere to the proposition that employers take their employees as they are.
Thomas A. Robinson, J.D., the Feature National Columnist for the LexisNexis Workers’ Compensation eNewsletter, is the co-author of Larson’s Workers’ Compensation Law (LexisNexis).
LexisNexis Online Subscribers: Citations below link to Lexis Advance. Bracketed citations link to lexis.com.
See Luettke v. Autoneum North America, Inc., 2015-Ohio–3210, 2015 Ohio App. LEXIS 3124 (Aug. 7, 2015) [2015-Ohio–3210, 2015 Ohio App. LEXIS 3124 (Aug. 7, 2015)]
See generally Larson’s Workers’ Compensation Law, § 9.02 [9.02]
Source: Larson’s Workers’ Compensation Law, the nation’s leading authority on workers’ compensation law.
For more information about LexisNexis products and solutions connect with us through our corporate site