Oakland, CA – A California Workers’ Compensation Institute (CWCI) review of the initial report on fiscal year (FY) 2023/24 California workers’ compensation public self-insured data shows...
Oakland, CA – New data from the California Workers’ Compensation Institute (CWCI) shows recent shifts in the types of drugs prescribed to injured workers in California, and in the distribution...
Oakland, CA – The Board of Directors of the California Workers’ Compensation Institute (CWCI) has named the Institute’s Chief Operating Officer, Gideon L. Baum, to succeed Alex Swedlow...
Here’s an interesting writ denied case regarding the issue of when stipulations may be set aside and when they may not. We’ll be reporting this case in the upcoming January 2025 issue of California...
By Hon. Colleen Casey, Former Commissioner, California Workers’ Compensation Appeals Board “Three’s a Crowd” in QME Panel Selection In the case of Hobbs v. N. Valley Elecs....
In a split (7–2) decision, the Supreme Court of Oklahoma has struck down yet another provision of the state’s controversial 2013 “reform” of its workers’ compensation law. The provision, Okla. Stat. tit. 85A, § 45(C)(5), defers the payment of a permanent partial disability award if the injured employee returns to her pre-injury position and pay. The employee sustained an admitted injury to her knee and had surgery to repair a tendon. After reaching MMI, she returned to her pre-injury position and wages with the employer. Following a hearing, the ALJ concluded that the employee had sustained two percent PPD to the body as a whole. Applying her payment rate, that resulted in an award of $2,261. Because she had returned to her job and pay scale, however, the ALJ deferred the award. The Commission sitting en banc affirmed. The Supreme Court found that deferral statute created an unfair “subclass” of employees and accordingly the statute was an unconstitutional denial of the employee’s due process rights. The Court stressed that the PPD award represented something the employee had lost, for which the employer was liable.
Thomas A. Robinson, J.D., the Feature National Columnist for the LexisNexis Workers’ Compensation eNewsletter, is the co-author of Larson’s Workers’ Compensation Law (LexisNexis).
LexisNexis Online Subscribers: Citations below link to Lexis Advance.
See Maxwell v. Sprint PCS, 2016 OK 41 (Okla. April 12, 2016)
See generally Larson’s Workers’ Compensation Law, § 80.04.
Source: Larson’s Workers’ Compensation Law, the nation’s leading authority on workers’ compensation law.