Oakland, CA – Migraine Drugs represented less than 1% of all prescriptions dispensed to California injured workers in 2023 but they consumed 4.7% of workers’ compensation drug payments, a nearly...
COMPLEX EMPLOYMENT ISSUES FOR CALIFORNIA WORKERS' COMPENSATION A new softbound supplement to Rassp & Herlick, California Workers’ Compensation Law 284 pages PIN #0006801214509 For...
By Hon. Colleen Casey, Former Commissioner, California Workers’ Compensation Appeals Board Just when you thought the right of “due process” was on the brink of destruction, the legislature...
By Hon. Susan V. Hamilton, Former Assistant Secretary and Deputy Commissioner, California Workers’ Compensation Appeals Board Over the past several decades California has implemented broad legislative...
CALIFORNIA COMPENSATION CASES Vol. 89, No. 9 September 2024 A Report of En Banc and Significant Panel Decisions of the WCAB and Selected Court Opinions of Related Interest, With a Digest of WCAB Decisions...
The fact that an employer provides an employee with a company-owned vehicle is not sufficient, absent additional factors, to bring the employee's travel within the course and scope of the employment, held a Texas appellate court. That the deceased employee may have been driving a friend to meet with the business owner, in hopes that the friend might be offered employment, did not sufficiently tie the travel to the employment as to allow recovery of death benefits for the employee's survivors. The court noted an important exception to the going and coming rule: when the employer provided transportation as part of the employment contract. The court stressed, however, that even in a situation as that in the instant case, where the employer provided the employee with a pickup truck for use both within and without the employment, the injury or death still had to originate in the employment. Here that was not the case, said the court.
Thomas A. Robinson, J.D., the Feature National Columnist for the LexisNexis Workers’ Compensation eNewsletter, is co-author of Larson’s Workers’ Compensation Law (LexisNexis).
LexisNexis Online Subscribers: Citations below link to Lexis Advance.
See Steen v. Tex. Mut. Ins. Co., 2019 Tex. App. LEXIS 7986 (7th Dist. Aug. 29, 2019)
See generally Larson’s Workers’ Compensation Law, § 15.03.
Source: Larson’s Workers’ Compensation Law, the nation’s leading authority on workers’ compensation law
For a more detailed discussion of the case, see