CALIFORNIA COMPENSATION CASES Vol. 89, No. 7 July 2024 A Report of En Banc and Significant Panel Decisions of the WCAB and Selected Court Opinions of Related Interest, With a Digest of WCAB Decisions...
Havanis v. Calif. Dept. of Transportation (Board Panel Decision) By Hon. Colleen Casey, Former Commissioner, California Workers’ Compensation Appeals Board I. Medical apportionment is not the...
By Robert G. Rassp, author of The Lawyer’s Guide to the AMA Guides and California Workers’ Compensation (LexisNexis) Disclaimer: The material and any opinions contained in this treatise are...
Oakland, CA – Private self-insured claim volume in the California workers' compensation system fell 9.5% in 2023, producing the biggest year-to-year decline in private self-insured claim frequency...
By Hon. Susan V. Hamilton, Former Assistant Secretary and Deputy Commissioner, California Workers’ Compensation Appeals Board No matter the source of your media consumption, it seems that the topic...
Where a worker entered into a contract with a labor broker that specified that the worker would be subject to the control of the firm to which he was assigned, that the firm to which he was assigned would be considered his “special employer,” that he specifically consented to such treatment, and that his sole remedy for any injury would be pursuant to the workers’ compensation laws of the state of Washington, it was still possible for the worker to raise an issue of fact as to whether he had waived his right to sue the special employer for negligence, held a Washington state appellate court. The court indicated, inter alia, that the special employer was not a party to the contract. Quoting a portion of an earlier decision that, in turn, had quoted Larson’s Workers’ Compensation Law, the court said there was a question of fact as to whether the worker believed he was the employee of the hiring firm. Summary judgment was, therefore, not appropriate.
Thomas A. Robinson, J.D., the Feature National Columnist for the LexisNexis Workers’ Compensation eNewsletter, is co-author of Larson’s Workers’ Compensation Law (LexisNexis).
LexisNexis Online Subscribers: Citations below link to Lexis Advance.
See Saling v. Gaither & Sons Constr., Co., 2019 Wash. App. LEXIS 2393 (Sept. 16, 2019)
See generally Larson’s Workers’ Compensation Law, § 64.01.
Source: Larson’s Workers’ Compensation Law, the nation’s leading authority on workers’ compensation law
For a more detailed discussion of the case, see