Here's an interesting Board panel decision about a long-standing guardian ad litem who continued to represent the applicant after that party reached the age of majority. The WCAB said that the guardian...
Oakland – A new California Workers’ Compensation Institute (CWCI) study finds that average paid losses on California workers’ compensation lost-time claims fell immediately after legislative...
By Thomas A. Robinson, Co-Editor-in-Chief, Workers’ Compensation Emerging Issues Analysis (LexisNexis) As we move through the third decade of the twenty-first century, the United States remains...
By Hon. Susan V. Hamilton, Former Assistant Secretary and Deputy Commissioner, California Workers’ Compensation Appeals Board Industrially injured workers in California are entitled to receive...
CALIFORNIA COMPENSATION CASES Vol. 88, No. 9 September 2023 A Report of En Banc and Significant Panel Decisions of the WCAB and Selected Court Opinions of Related Interest, With a Digest of WCAB Decisions...
In spite of the deference afforded West Virginia's Workers' Compensation Board of Review when it comes to fact-finding, the state's Supreme Court, in a memorandum decision, reversed the Board's decision that awarded benefits for a worker's bilateral rotator cuff tears. Noting that the worker's primary physician had been the only physician to opine that the worker's compensable injury resulted in bilateral rotator cuff tears, the Court pointed to the same doctor's deposition, in which he had indicated it was very difficult for him to determine if the rotator cuff tears were the result of degeneration or trauma. The Court also noted that the physician testified that he usually referred patients to a specialist to make the causation determination. Given such guarded testimony, in the face of multiple other medical experts, including one who performed an independent medical evaluation of the worker, who did not tie the workers' injury to his rotator cuff tears, the Court said there was insufficient support for the Board's findings. The matter was remanded for reinstatement of the earlier decision denying benefits.
Thomas A. Robinson, J.D., the Feature National Columnist for the LexisNexis Workers’ Compensation eNewsletter, is co-author of Larson’s Workers’ Compensation Law (LexisNexis).
LexisNexis Online Subscribers: Citations below link to Lexis Advance.
See West Va. Univ. v. Shaffer, 2020 W. Va. LEXIS 525 (July 9, 2020)
See generally Larson’s Workers’ Compensation Law, § 128.03.
Source: Larson’s Workers’ Compensation Law, the nation’s leading authority on workers’ compensation law
For a more detailed discussion of the case, see
Sign up for the free LexisNexis Workers’ Compensation enewsletter at www.lexisnexis.com/wcnews.