Menu
SIGN IN
Vinayak Kohli
over 3 years ago
Case Opinion
case
MediaTek Inc. v. Freescale Semiconductor, Inc.
MediaTek Inc. v. Freescale Semiconductor, Inc. United States District Court for the Northern District of California February 13, 2014, Decided; February 13, 2014, Filed Case No.: 11-cv-5341 YGR Opinion Order Denying Freescale's Motion For Summary...
baerreedauthor
over 3 years ago
Casebrief
Baer Reed
EEOC v. Boh Bros. Constr. Co., L.L.C
Kerry Woods, an iron worker on Chuck Wolfe’s crew, had become a specific and frequent target of Wolfe’s abuse because Wolfe thought that Woods was not manly enough. Wolfe would often call Woods sex-based epithets and would mock him with sexualized...
baerreedauthor
over 3 years ago
Casebrief
Baer Reed
Erickson v. Queen Valley Ranch Co.
Plaintiff landowners owned 240 acres of ranch land. The prior owners established an appropriative right to the entire flow of Morris Creek and built a diversion dam and ditch. Defendant corporation was issued an appropriative permit to transport pipeline...
Vinayak Kohli
over 4 years ago
Case Opinion
case
Avia Group Int'l, Inc. v. L.A. Gear Cal., Inc.
Avia Group Int'l, Inc. v. L.A. Gear Cal., Inc. United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit July 29, 1988, Decided No. 87-1505 Opinion [***1550] [*1559] NIES, Circuit Judge. L.A. Gear California, Inc. (LAG) appeals the decision of the...
baerreedauthor
over 5 years ago
Casebrief
Baer Reed
Pasquantino v. United States
Petitioners Carl J. Pasquantino, David B. Pasquantino, and Arthur Hilts carried out a scheme to smuggle large quantities of liquor into Canada from the United States to evade Canada's heavy alcohol import taxes. They were convicted of violating the...
Vinayak Kohli
over 5 years ago
Practical Guidance Journal
pa
Solar Electricity Sales Regulation
ADAPTED FROM ENERGY LAW AND TRANSACTIONS , David J. Muchow and William A. Mogel , General Editors, 3 Energy Law and Transactions 71.01-71.04 This article explains the regulatory framework under the Public Utility Regulatory Policies Act of 1978 (PURPA...
baerreedauthor
over 5 years ago
Casebrief
Baer Reed
Prescott v. Jones
Defendants Jones and his partner, as insurance agents (collectively, "Agents"), insured the Prescott's buildings until Feb. 1, 1897. On Jan. 23, 1897, they notified him by letter that they would renew the policy and insure his buildings...
baerreedauthor
over 5 years ago
Casebrief
Baer Reed
Bell v. VPSI, Inc.
Defendant Transportation Authority ("Authority") was a regional political subdivision of the State of Texas that provided public transportation services in and around Tarrant County. Defendant VPSI, Inc., was provided and operated a commuter...
Vinayak Kohli
over 5 years ago
Practical Guidance Journal
pa
Hatch-Waxman Pre-suit Considerations from the Generic Perspective
By: Janet B. Linn , Tarter Krinsky & Drogin LLP This article addresses how counsel for a generic drug company should prepare for patent litigation under the Drug Price Competition and Patent Term Restoration Act of 1984, better known as the Hatch...
baerreedauthor
over 6 years ago
Casebrief
Baer Reed
Davis v. Washington
The two cases required a determination of when statements made to law enforcement personnel during a 911 call or at a crime scene were "testimonial" and subject to the requirements of the Sixth Amendment's Confrontation Clause. In Case No...
<
>