Menu SIGN IN
  • Vinayak Kohli
    Vinayak Kohli
    • over 2 years ago
    • Case Opinion
    • case

    Mistretta v. United States

    Mistretta v. United States Supreme Court of the United States October 5, 1988, Argued ; January 18, 1989, 1 Decided No. 87-7028 Opinion  [*362]   [***724]   [**650]  JUSTICE BLACKMUN delivered the opinion of the Court. In this litigation, we granted certiorari...
  • MelanieR
    MelanieR
    • over 2 years ago
    • Professional
    • Industry Insights

    What Germany's Due Diligence Law Means for Supply Chain

    Germany’s Supply Chain Due Diligence Act has been effective since 1 st January 2023. The new law requires large companies operating in Germany to carry out human rights and environmental due diligence on their business and its suppliers. Now, many...
  • baerreedauthor
    baerreedauthor
    • over 2 years ago
    • Casebrief
    • Baer Reed

    Crystal Entm't & Filmworks, Inc. v. Jurado

    Plaintiff entertainment company was the purported assignee of the trademark rights of Pantera Group Enterprises and Pantera Productions, Inc., which created the original Exposé band in 1984. The current members of Exposé replaced the original...
  • baerreedauthor
    baerreedauthor
    • over 2 years ago
    • Casebrief
    • Baer Reed

    Moore v. Dover Veterinary Hosp.

    After plaintiff, a veterinarian, instituted an action for declaratory judgment seeking to have a restrictive covenant entered into with defendant, his former employer, declared unenforceable, the matter was heard before a Master, who made written findings...
  • baerreedauthor
    baerreedauthor
    • over 3 years ago
    • Casebrief
    • Baer Reed

    Coca-Cola Co. v. Busch

    Coca-Cola Co. was engaged and has been for many years in the manufacture of a soft drink syrup under the trademark "Coca-Cola". A considerable portion of the public abbreviate the trademark to "koke (coke)," and call for it as "koke...
  • Vinayak Kohli
    Vinayak Kohli
    • over 3 years ago
    • Case Opinion
    • case

    Travers v. Fed. Express Corp.

    Travers v. Fed. Express Corp. United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit March 16, 2021, Argued; August 10, 2021, Filed No. 20-2703 Opinion  [*199]  OPINION OF THE COURT MATEY, Circuit Judge . Those who serve in the military must also balance...
  • Vinayak Kohli
    Vinayak Kohli
    • over 3 years ago
    • Case Opinion
    • case

    Jones v. Bender Welding & Machine Works, Inc.

    Jones v. Bender Welding & Machine Works, Inc. United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit August 10, 1978 Nos. 76-2684, 76-2114 Opinion  [*1332]  In this admiralty and diversity suit brought under 28 U.S.C. §§ 1332 and 1333 , plaintiff, a...
  • Vinayak Kohli
    Vinayak Kohli
    • over 3 years ago
    • Case Opinion
    • case

    2007 U.S. Comp. Gen. LEXIS 141; 2007 Comp. Gen. Proc. Dec. P135

    2007 U.S. Comp. Gen. LEXIS 141; 2007 Comp. Gen. Proc. Dec. P135 Comptroller General of the United States March 5, 2007 B-299175, B-299175.2 Opinion [EDITOR'S NOTE: PAGE NUMBERS APPEARING IN BOLD BRACKETS, [CPD 1], REFLECT THE OFFICIAL PAGINATION OF...
  • Vinayak Kohli
    Vinayak Kohli
    • over 4 years ago
    • Case Opinion
    • case

    In re Kind LLC "Healthy & All Nat. " Litig.

    In re Kind LLC "Healthy & All Nat. " Litig. United States District Court for the Southern District of New York March 24, 2021, Decided; March 24, 2021, Filed 15md2645; 15mc2645 Opinion OPINION & ORDER WILLIAM H. PAULEY III, Senior District...
  • Vinayak Kohli
    Vinayak Kohli
    • over 4 years ago
    • Case Opinion
    • case

    In re Energy Future Holdings Corp.

    In re Energy Future Holdings Corp. United States Bankruptcy Court for the District of Delaware October 3, 2017, Decided Chapter 11, Case No.: 14-10979 (CSS) Jointly Administered Docket Nos.: 9584, 11636 Opinion Sontchi, J. /s/ Sontchi  [*620]  INTRODUCTION...
<>
LexisNexis
privacy policy consumer access terms & conditions Cookie Policy
Copyright © 2025 LexisNexis
LexisNexis