• George Hunt v. Dorsey Young Constr.

    Defendant George Hunt, Inc. ("Hunt") was the general contractor for the construction of a two building shopping center. Plaintiff Dorsey Young Construction, Inc. ("Dorsey"), as a subcontractor, was to supply concrete slabs, foundations...
  • Potts v. Fid. Fruit & Produce Co.

    The appellant sued to recover for personal injuries which he allegedly sustained when he was bitten by a spider while unloading bananas from a truck. The incident occurred during the course of his employment with Colonial Stores. The employee filed suit...
  • Rales v. Blasband

    Alfred Blasband is a current stockholder of Danaher. Prior to 1990 Blasband owned 1100 shares of Easco Hand Tools, Inc., a Delaware corporation (Easco). Easco entered into a merger agreement with Danaher in February 1990 whereby Easco became a wholly...
  • TWA v. Hardison

    Hardison was employed by Trans World Airlines (TWA) in a department that operated 24 hours a day throughout the year in connection with an airplane maintenance and overhaul base.Hardison was subject to a seniority system in a collective-bargaining agreement...
  • Filo v. Liberato

    Appellant was a subcontractor on a commercial construction project owned by Appellee. Appellant approached Appellee because the general contractor was behind in making payments to Appellant. According to Appellant, Appellee promised him that he would...
  • Wells Fargo Bank Na v. Haq

    Wells Fargo Bank Na v. Haq Supreme Court of New York, Richmond County June 8, 2023, Decided; June 14, 2023, Published 135486/2017 Opinion Defendant moved to renew or reconsider the court's Jan 28, 2022, decision that had granted a judgment of foreclosure...
  • Meyhoeffer v. Wallace

    Defendant lessee leased 530 acres of farm land from the plaintiff lessor. As part of the lease agreement, the lessee granted a security interest in the crops to the lessor. The lease was recorded in the conveyance records, but the security interest was...
  • February 2022 Litigation Insights

    February 2022 Litigation Insights
  • Sturm. Ruger & Co. v. Day

    Appellee Michael James Day bought a.41 magnum single action revolver on June 1, 1972. The gun had been manufactured two years before by appellant Sturm, Ruger and Company, in August of 1970, but was purchased new by Day. On July 30, 1972, Day was sitting...
  • Scott v. Dixon

    Defendants Peter Dixon and Candida Dixon asked plaintiff Linda Scott to create a work of art for the back yard of their property. The specific work of art that the plaintiff was asked to create was a sculpture of a swan. In response to defendants'...