Perniciaro v. Lea United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit August 16, 2018, Filed No. 17-30161 Opinion  [*246]  STEPHEN A. HIGGINSON, Circuit Judge: Dominick Perniciaro, III, who suffers from schizophrenia, has been committed to the Eastern...

Heidbreder v. Epic Games, Inc. United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, Western Division February 1, 2020, Decided; February 3, 2020, Filed No. 5:19-cv-348-BO Opinion  [*594]  ORDER This matter is before the Court on defendant's...

A Kansas deputy sheriff ran a license plate check on a pickup truck, discovering that the truck belonged to respondent Glover and that Glover's driver's license had been revoked. The deputy pulled the truck over because he assumed that Glover...

Klayman v. Zuckerberg United States District Court for the District of Columbia December 28, 2012, Decided; December 28, 2012, Filed Civil Action No. 11-874 (RBW) Opinion  [*315]  MEMORANDUM OPINION The pro se plaintiff, Larry Klayman, brings this action...

Letelier v. Republic of Chile United States District Court for the District of Columbia November 5, 1980 Civ. A. No. 78-1477 Opinion  [*260]  MEMORANDUM OPINION This action is before the Court for a final determination relevant to the attempt of plaintiffs...

Defendant James Michael Marles was charged with aggravated sexual assault of a child. During the trial in Texas state court, the arresting officer testified that when she informed Marles of the charge, he defecated in his pants. Marles objected that the...

Defendant Miller was the owner of the Oakland Avenue real property and that she listed it for sale with a realtor, Gladys Hawkins. Richard Byer, a real estate broker with the firm Gallery of Homes, showed the property to plaintiffs Normile and Kurniawan...

Petitioners are four individuals who live in Virginia, which has a Federal Exchange. They do not wish to purchase health insurance. In their view, Virginia's Exchange does not qualify as “an Exchange established by the State under 42 U.S.C.S...

Plaintiff provided information to police, and the assailant was placed under arrest and confessed to the murder. Plaintiff then sought the reward offered under the statute from defendant State. The trial court concluded that plaintiff failed to comply...

Plaintiff clinic and physician challenged the Parental Notice of Abortion Act of 1995as unconstitutional on its face. The Appellate Court reversed the lower court, finding that the Act was unconstitutional.