Menu SIGN IN
  • Vinayak Kohli
    Vinayak Kohli
    • over 4 years ago
    • Case Opinion
    • case

    Papst Licensing GmbH & Co. KG v. Fujifilm Corp. (In re Papst Licensing Digital Camera Patent Litig.)

    Papst Licensing GmbH & Co. KG v. Fujifilm Corp. (In re Papst Licensing Digital Camera Patent Litig.) United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit February 2, 2015, Decided 2014-1110 Opinion  [*1258]   [***1535]  Taranto , Circuit Judge ...
  • Vinayak Kohli
    Vinayak Kohli
    • over 4 years ago
    • Case Opinion
    • case

    245 N.L.R.B. 814; 1979 NLRB LEXIS 1875; 102 L.R.R.M. 1247; 1979-80 NLRB Dec. (CCH) P16,338; 245 NLRB No. 107

    245 N.L.R.B. 814; 1979 NLRB LEXIS 1875; 102 L.R.R.M. 1247; 1979-80 NLRB Dec. (CCH) P16,338; 245 NLRB No. 107 National Labor Relations Board September 28, 1979 Case 10-CA-13634 Opinion  [**1]  DECISION AND ORDER  [*814]  On December 15, 1978, Administrative...
  • Vinayak Kohli
    Vinayak Kohli
    • over 5 years ago
    • Case Opinion
    • case

    Wo Yee Hing Realty Corp. v. Stern

    Wo Yee Hing Realty Corp. v. Stern Supreme Court of New York, Appellate Division, First Department July 31, 2012, Decided; July 31, 2012, Entered 115517/07, 7020 Opinion  [*60]  Saxe, J.P.  [**51]  The issue presented in this legal malpractice action is...
  • Vinayak Kohli
    Vinayak Kohli
    • over 5 years ago
    • Case Opinion
    • case

    Janus v. AFSCME, Council 31

    Janus v. AFSCME, Council 31 Supreme Court of the United States February 26, 2018, Argued; June 27, 2018, Decided No. 16-1466. Opinion Justice Alito delivered the opinion of the Court. Under Illinois law, public employees are forced to subsidize a union...
  • Rake
    Rake
    • over 5 years ago
    • LexTalk® UK
    • LexTalk® Employment

    TUPE or not TUPE

    I am a service provider and I've just lost a tendering exercise. The incoming provider says no TUPE and will not engage. They do not need/want my employees, so they really want to avoid TUPE. (The client has buried his head). The particular TUPE point...
  • Vinayak Kohli
    Vinayak Kohli
    • over 2 years ago
    • Case Opinion
    • case

    Day v. GEICO Cas. Co.

    Day v. GEICO Cas. Co. United States District Court for the Northern District of California, San Jose Division January 20, 2022, Decided; January 20, 2022, Filed Case No. 21-cv-02103-BLF Opinion ORDER GRANTING IN PART WITH LEAVE TO AMEND IN PART AND DENYING...
  • baerreedauthor
    baerreedauthor
    • over 3 years ago
    • Casebrief
    • Baer Reed

    Pleasant Prairie v. Kenosha

    Appellee city annexed certain lands in the town. The annexation was commenced at the behest of two property owners who filed a petition with the city to annex the lands, and who also sought to rezone most of the proposed annexation for industrial use...
  • baerreedauthor
    baerreedauthor
    • over 3 years ago
    • Casebrief
    • Baer Reed

    S.V. v. R.V.

    Respondent daughter brought an action against petitioner father that alleged negligent sexual abuse of petitioner before the age of 17. The daughter alleged that she had repressed the memories of the abuse, and brought the action as an adult after she...
  • Vinayak Kohli
    Vinayak Kohli
    • over 3 years ago
    • Case Opinion
    • case

    Collins v. Yellen

    Collins v. Yellen Supreme Court of the United States December 9, 2020, Argued; June 23, 2021 1 , Decided Nos. 19-422 and 19-563. Opinion Justice Alito delivered the opinion of the Court. Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac are two of the Nation’s leading sources...
  • Vinayak Kohli
    Vinayak Kohli
    • over 4 years ago
    • Case Opinion
    • case

    Mckesson Corp. v. Orexigen Therapeutics, Inc. (In re Orexigen Therapeutics, Inc.)

    Mckesson Corp. v. Orexigen Therapeutics, Inc. (In re Orexigen Therapeutics, Inc.) United States District Court for the District of Delaware January 3, 2020, Decided; January 3, 2020, Filed Civ. No. 18-1873-CFC Opinion MEMORANDUM OPINION /s/ Colm F. Connolly...
<>
LexisNexis
privacy policy consumer access terms & conditions Cookie Policy
Copyright © 2025 LexisNexis
LexisNexis