Menu SIGN IN
  • baerreedauthor
    baerreedauthor
    • over 5 years ago
    • Casebrief
    • Baer Reed

    Shanken v. Lee Wolfman, Inc.

    Plaintiff, James I. Shanken, individually and as a representative and registered shareholder of Lee Wolfman, Inc., which merchandises ladies' ready-to-wear from its store on Kirby Drive in Houston under the name of "Wolfman's," brought...
  • Vinayak Kohli
    Vinayak Kohli
    • over 5 years ago
    • Case Opinion
    • case

    2011 CFTC LEXIS 44; Comm. Fut. L. Rep. (CCH) P 32013

    2011 CFTC LEXIS 44; Comm. Fut. L. Rep. (CCH) P 32013 Commodity Futures Trading Commission July 19, 2011 CFTC DOCKET NO. 11-16 Opinion ORDER INSTITUTING PROCEEDINGS PURSUANT TO SECTIONS 6(c), AND 6(d) OF THE COMMODITY EXCHANGES ACT, MAKING FINDINGS AND...
  • baerreedauthor
    baerreedauthor
    • over 5 years ago
    • Casebrief
    • Baer Reed

    West v. Roberts

    Kenneth James West relinquished his car in exchange for a cashier's check that appeared valid, but which thereafter proved to be a worthless counterfeit. When he later located the car in the possession of a subsequent purchaser, Tammy Roberts, West...
  • baerreedauthor
    baerreedauthor
    • over 5 years ago
    • Casebrief
    • Baer Reed

    Simpson v. Ernst & Young

    Plaintiff employee instituted an action against defendant employer for discrimination. After a mistrial, when the jury could not agree whether the employee was in fact an employee or a partner, the parties submitted the issue in a motion for summary judgment...
  • Simon
    Simon
    • over 5 years ago
    • LexTalk® UK
    • LexTalk® Immigration

    Can a Tier 2 Certificate of Sponsorship be assigned to somebody who has a pending immigration appeal for an application for indefinite leave to remain that was submitted more than 28 days after his previous leave to remain was cancelled?

    If so, would they classed as a new entrant or an experienced worker?
  • baerreedauthor
    baerreedauthor
    • over 6 years ago
    • Casebrief
    • Baer Reed

    Yates v. United States

    Fourteen Communist Party members challenged their convictions for conspiracy to violate the Smith Act. They argued that prosecution of their organizing activities was barred by the three-year statute of limitations, 18 U.S.C.S. § 3282 , and that...
  • baerreedauthor
    baerreedauthor
    • over 6 years ago
    • Casebrief
    • Baer Reed

    Zahn v. Int'l Paper Co.

    Petitioners, owners of property fronting on Lake Champlain, brought a diversity action in the district court seeking to recover damages for respondent's pollution of the lake. Petitioners sought to maintain a class action under Fed. R. Civ. P. 23...
  • baerreedauthor
    baerreedauthor
    • over 6 years ago
    • Casebrief
    • Baer Reed

    People v. Grant

    A third party was involved in an altercation with tavern owner. While the third party was being arrested, defendant broke through the crowd and struck one police officer in the face. Defendant suffered a seizure in jail and was taken to the hospital....
  • Vinayak Kohli
    Vinayak Kohli
    • over 2 years ago
    • Case Opinion
    • case

    United States v. 4,432 Mastercases of Cigarettes

    United States v. 4,432 Mastercases of Cigarettes United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit November 16, 2005, Argued and Submitted, Pasadena, California ; June 2, 2006, Filed No. 04-55354, No. 04-55356, No. 04-56350 Opinion  [*1172]  WARDLAW...
  • Vinayak Kohli
    Vinayak Kohli
    • over 2 years ago
    • Case Opinion
    • case

    Suncor Energy (U.S.A.) Inc. v. Bd. of Cnty. Comm'rs

    Suncor Energy (U.S.A.) Inc. v. Bd. of Cnty. Comm'rs Supreme Court of the United States October 3, 2022, Decided No. 21-1550. Opinion The Solicitor General is invited to file a brief in this case expressing the views of the United States. Read The...
<>
LexisNexis
privacy policy consumer access terms & conditions Cookie Policy
Copyright © 2025 LexisNexis
LexisNexis