Menu SIGN IN
  • Vinayak Kohli
    Vinayak Kohli
    • over 4 years ago
    • Case Opinion
    • case

    World Wide Minerals Ltd. v. Republic of Kazakhstahn

    World Wide Minerals Ltd. v. Republic of Kazakhstahn United States District Court for the District of Columbia September 27, 2000, Decided ; September 27, 2000, Filed 98 CV 1199-RCL Opinion  [*101]  MEMORANDUM OPINION Plaintiffs World Wide Minerals Ltd...
  • Vinayak Kohli
    Vinayak Kohli
    • over 4 years ago
    • Case Opinion
    • case

    Ark. Game & Fish Comm'n v. United States

    Ark. Game & Fish Comm'n v. United States Supreme Court of the United States October 3, 2012, Argued; December 4, 2012, Decided No. 11-597 Opinion  [*26]   [**515]  Justice Ginsburg delivered the opinion of the Court. Periodically from 1993 until...
  • baerreedauthor
    baerreedauthor
    • over 4 years ago
    • Casebrief
    • Baer Reed

    Morejon v. Rais Constr. Co.

    Plaintiff, on behalf of the estate of Fabio Pardo, sued defendant Rais Construction Company, alleging that Pardo was fatally injured while delivering building materials to Rais Construction for a job it was doing at the residence owned by Barry and Susan...
  • Vinayak Kohli
    Vinayak Kohli
    • over 4 years ago
    • Case Opinion
    • case

    C-Y Dev. Co. v. Redlands

    C-Y Dev. Co. v. Redlands United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit September 8, 1982, Argued and Submitted ; March 8, 1983, Decided No. 81-5779 Opinion  [*376]  WALLACE, Circuit Judge: C-Y Development Company and Harvest Investment Company...
  • Vinayak Kohli
    Vinayak Kohli
    • over 5 years ago
    • Case Opinion
    • case

    Safeway Transit LLC v. Disc. Party Bus, Inc.

    Safeway Transit LLC v. Disc. Party Bus, Inc. United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit December 11, 2019, Submitted; April 6, 2020, Filed No. 18-2990 Opinion SMITH, Chief Judge.  [*1174]  Safeway Transit LLC ("Safeway"), a party...
  • Vinayak Kohli
    Vinayak Kohli
    • over 5 years ago
    • Case Opinion
    • case

    Retractable Techs., Inc. v. Becton Dickinson & Co.

    Retractable Techs., Inc. v. Becton Dickinson & Co. United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit March 26, 2019, Filed No. 17-40960 Opinion  [*872]  PATRICK E. HIGGINBOTHAM, Circuit Judge: A jury found that Becton Dickinson & Co. falsely...
  • Vinayak Kohli
    Vinayak Kohli
    • over 5 years ago
    • Case Opinion
    • case

    Apple Inc. v. Samsung Elecs. Co.

    Apple Inc. v. Samsung Elecs. Co. United States District Court for the Northern District of California, San Jose Division May 9, 2013, Decided; May 9, 2013, Filed Case No.: 12-CV-0630-LHK (PSG) Opinion ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO COMPEL (Re: Docket Nos. 418...
  • Vinayak Kohli
    Vinayak Kohli
    • over 5 years ago
    • Case Opinion
    • case

    Swamy v. Title Source, Inc.

    Swamy v. Title Source, Inc. United States District Court for the Northern District of California November 10, 2017, Decided; November 10, 2017, Filed No. C 17-01175 WHA Opinion ORDER RE MOTION FOR CONDITIONAL CERTIFICATION AND FOR A PROTECTIVE ORDER INTRODUCTION...
  • baerreedauthor
    baerreedauthor
    • over 6 years ago
    • Casebrief
    • Baer Reed

    Brunckhorst v. City of Oak Park Heights

    Plaintiff-appellant Gary Brunckhorst filed this employment discrimination suit under the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA), 42 U.S.C. § 12101 et seq. , and the Minnesota Human Rights Act (MHRA), Minn. Stat. § 363A.01 et seq. , against his...
  • baerreedauthor
    baerreedauthor
    • over 7 years ago
    • Casebrief
    • Baer Reed

    Cast v. Nat'l Bank of Commerce Tr. & Sav. Asso.

    The will provided the appellee devisee, within a year after the testator's death, was to move to and occupy a devised farm as his residence and domicile for a period of 25 years. It provided that the devisee was, within one year by appropriate legal...
<>
LexisNexis
privacy policy consumer access terms & conditions Cookie Policy
Copyright © 2025 LexisNexis
LexisNexis