• Aleksanian v. Uber Techs., Inc.

    Aleksanian v. Uber Techs., Inc. United States District Court for the Southern District of New York March 8, 2021, Decided; March 8, 2021, Filed 1:19-cv-10308 (ALC) Opinion ORDER & OPINION ANDREW L. CARTER, JR., United States District Judge : Plaintiffs...

  • 27 I. & N. Dec. 441; 2018 BIA LEXIS 31

    27 I. & N. Dec. 441; 2018 BIA LEXIS 31 Department of Justice, Board of Immigration Appeals August 31, 2018, Decided 3935 Opinion  [*441]  KENDALL CLARK, Board Member: In a decision dated October 3, 2017, an Immigration Judge denied the respondent's...

  • Closing the Door on Bankruptcy With Bankruptcy Remote Entities

    Your bank client is ready and willing to lend funds as part of a commercial real estate transaction. However, the lender wants to protect against the risk that the borrower subsequently files for bankruptcy and is substantively consolidated with the borrower’s...

  • In re Cal. Innovations, Inc.

    California Innovations, Inc. (CA Innovations), a Canadian-based corporation, appeals the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board's refusal to register its mark - CALIFORNIA INNOVATIONS. Citing section 2(e)(3) of the Lanham Act, 15 U.S.C. § 1052(e)(3...

  • Cambridge Univ. Press v. Patton

    Plaintiffs, three publishing houses, Cambridge University Press, Oxford University Press, and Sage Publications, Inc., alleged that Defendants, members of the Board of Regents of the University System of Georgia and officials at Georgia State University...

  • Centex Homes v. Buecher

    Michael Buecher and other homeowners purchased new homes built by Centex Homes or Centex Real Estate Corporation doing business as Centex Homes. Each homeowner signed a standard form sales agreement prepared by Centex. The homeowners allege that the agreement...

  • Ill. C. R. Co. v. Crail

    Petitioner sought review of a Circuit Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit judgment under the Cummins Amendment, 49 U.S.C.S. § 20(11), for the retail value of coal not delivered. Respondent coal dealer purchased, while in transit, a carload of...

  • Chaplin v. Du Pont Advance Fiber Sys.

    In 2000, Du Pont Advance Fiber Systems, Du Pont Spruance, and Du Pont Textiles & Interiors, Incorporated (collectively, "Du Pont") instituted a policy banning the display of offensive symbols--including the Confederate battle flag--on Du...

  • Mid-Continent Wood Prods., Inc. v. Harris

    Defendant debtor sought review of a decision from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois, denying defendant's motion to vacate and dismiss a default judgment obtained by plaintiff creditor on the grounds of improper...

  • State v. Saylor

    At a department store, defendant Glen Lee Saylor apparently unwrapped and resealed a cardboard box containing a large plastic toy chest shaped like a pig. An unaware cashier later processed Saylor's purchase of a quart of oil and the toy chest. Saylor...