• Chang v. Children's Advocacy Ctr.

    Chang v. Children's Advocacy Ctr. United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit July 2, 2019, Argued; September 12, 2019, Filed No. 18-2311 Opinion  [*386]  PORTER, Circuit Judge. Weih Chang appeals the District Court's orders dismissing...
  • Chang v. Children's Advocacy Ctr.

    Chang v. Children's Advocacy Ctr. Supreme Court of the United States October 5, 2020, Decided No. 19-1312. Opinion Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit denied. Read The Full Case Not a Lexis Advance...
  • Bernstein v. Virgin Am., Inc.

    Bernstein v. Virgin Am., Inc. United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit January 14, 2021, Argued and Submitted; February 23, 2021, Filed Nos. 19-15382, 20-15186 Opinion M. SMITH, Circuit Judge: This case requires us to determine whether certain...
  • Armstrong World Industries, Inc. v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.

    Armstrong World Industries, Inc. v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. Court of Appeal of California, First Appellate District, Division One April 30, 1996, Decided Nos. A049419, A049631, A049654, A049659, A049661, A049663, A049664, A049665, A049666, A049667...
  • Find and Share the Right Research Insights with Decision Makers

    When Harvard Business Review surveyed competitive intelligence professionals, 45 percent of respondents said their analysis wasn’t having an impact on major decisions. What’s more, 33 percent said their reports were simply used to “ratify”...
  • Caban v. Mohammed

    N.Y. Dom. Rel. Law § 111 granted an unwed mother the authority to block the adoption of her child simply by withholding her consent, but did not give an unwed father a similar right. The unwed, natural father of two children challenged the constitutionality...
  • Amazon.com, Inc. v. Barnesandnoble.com, Inc.

    In patent infringement suit, plaintiff Amazon.com, Inc. moved for a preliminary injunction to prohibit the use of defendant barnesandnoble.com llc of a feature of its website called "Express Lane." Defendant resisted the preliminary injunction...
  • Keelan v. Majesco Software, Inc.

    Appellant Ivor Keelan, a citizen of the United Kingdom, worked as a regional sales director for defendant-appellee Majesco Software, Inc. (“Majesco”). He was hired as an employee-at-will. During his first four months on the job, Keelan generated...
  • Douglas Oil Co. v. Petrol Stops Nw.

    Several independent gasoline dealers filed antitrust actions in the United States District Court for the District of Arizona against several large oil companies. While discovery proceedings were under way, a federal grand jury empaneled in the Central...
  • Sporck v. Peil

    Plaintiff-respondent Raymond K. Peil alleged that defendant National Semiconductor Corporation ("NSC"), defendant-petitioner Charles F. Sporck, NSC's president, and defendant Peter J. Sprague, NSC's chairman, conspired to inflate artificially...