Menu SIGN IN
  • Vinayak Kohli
    Vinayak Kohli
    • over 2 years ago
    • Case Opinion
    • case

    Public Utilities Comm'n v. Pollak

    Public Utilities Comm'n v. Pollak Supreme Court of the United States March 3, 1952, Argued ; May 26, 1952, Decided No. 224 Opinion  [*453]   [**816]   [***1073]  MR. JUSTICE BURTON delivered the opinion of the Court. The principal question here is...
  • Vinayak Kohli
    Vinayak Kohli
    • over 3 years ago
    • Case Opinion
    • case

    United States v. Guertin

    United States v. Guertin United States District Court for the District of Columbia January 24, 2022, Decided; January 24, 2022, Filed Case No. 1:21-cr-262 (TNM) Opinion MEMORANDUM OPINION Paul Michael Guertin stands accused of committing wire fraud, in...
  • baerreedauthor
    baerreedauthor
    • over 3 years ago
    • Casebrief
    • Baer Reed

    Day & Zimmermann, Inc. v. Challoner

    After a 105-mm. howitzer round prematurely exploded in Cambodia, respondents filed suit to recover for the resulting deaths and personal injuries. The suit was filed in the district court based on diversity of citizenship. The district court submitted...
  • Sherica Celine
    Sherica Celine
    • over 3 years ago
    • Legal Insights Blog
    • Practical Guidance

    Pay Me My Money . . . Back: Indemnification Provisions in M&A Transactions

    Indemnification provisions are typically found in M&A transactions involving a private target and generally cover two categories of claims: claims between the parties and third-party claims. The purpose of indemnification provisions is to specify...
  • Sherica Celine
    Sherica Celine
    • over 3 years ago
    • Legal Insights Blog
    • Practical Guidance

    No Better Time to Check your Clients’ Compliance

    Given the increased focus on enforcement at the FTC and, likely soon, the DOJ, it is a good time to check your clients’ antitrust compliance policies. Our risk assessment practice note is a good way to check the most salient risks your clients face...
  • Vinayak Kohli
    Vinayak Kohli
    • over 3 years ago
    • Case Opinion
    • case

    Watson v. Ft. Worth Bank & Trust

    Watson v. Ft. Worth Bank & Trust Supreme Court of the United States January 20, 1988, Argued ; June 29, 1988, Decided No. 86-6139 Opinion  [*982]   [***837]   [**2782]  JUSTICE O'CONNOR announced the judgment of the Court and delivered the opinion...
  • Vinayak Kohli
    Vinayak Kohli
    • over 4 years ago
    • Case Opinion
    • case

    Religious Tech. Ctr. v. Lerma

    Religious Tech. Ctr. v. Lerma United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, Alexandria Division October 4, 1996, Decided ; October 4, 1996, FILED Civil Action No. 95-1107-A Opinion  [**1571]  MEMORANDUM OPINION ON RELIGIOUS TECHNOLOGY...
  • baerreedauthor
    baerreedauthor
    • over 4 years ago
    • Casebrief
    • Baer Reed

    United States v. Jorgensen

    In the mid-1980s, Gregory Jorgensen conceived the idea of gathering a group of South Dakota cattle producers together to market and sell the processed beef derived from their own cattle, hoping to increase the net return from their raised cattle while...
  • baerreedauthor
    baerreedauthor
    • over 4 years ago
    • Casebrief
    • Baer Reed

    Stewart v. Johnson

    Lott W. Johnson, deceased, a man of about 76 years of age, had in his lifetime accumulated considerable property and other evidences of wealth. In 1937 deceased made a will disposing of his holdings, the same being in good legal form according to Florida...
  • Vinayak Kohli
    Vinayak Kohli
    • over 4 years ago
    • Case Opinion
    • case

    28 I. & N. Dec. 191; 2021 BIA LEXIS 1

    28 I. & N. Dec. 191; 2021 BIA LEXIS 1 Department of Justice, Board of Immigration Appeals January 8, 2021, Decided 4005 Opinion  [*191]  MALPHRUS, Deputy Chief Appellate Immigration Judge: In a decision dated December 19, 2019, an Immigration Judge...
<>
LexisNexis
privacy policy consumer access terms & conditions Cookie Policy
Copyright © 2025 LexisNexis
LexisNexis