Menu SIGN IN
  • Rosie
    Rosie
    • over 5 years ago
    • LexTalk® UK
    • LexTalk® Tax

    Under the post-April 2020 off-payroll working rules, when will there be an obligation to provide a status determination statement?

    I would be grateful if someone could assist with the above.
  • baerreedauthor
    baerreedauthor
    • over 6 years ago
    • Casebrief
    • Baer Reed

    Koontz v. St. Johns River Water Mgmt. Dist.

    Coy Koontz, Sr., whose estate is represented here by petitioner, sought permits to develop a section of his property from respondent St. Johns River Water Management District (District). Consistent with Florida law, the District required permit applicants...
  • baerreedauthor
    baerreedauthor
    • over 6 years ago
    • Casebrief
    • Baer Reed

    Peckham v. Milroy

    Appellant Thomas Milroy began operating a day-care in the family residence. A restrictive covenant prohibited home businesses in the neighborhood, and Milroy's property was subject to the covenant. Respondent Gordon Peckham sued to enjoin the day...
  • baerreedauthor
    baerreedauthor
    • over 6 years ago
    • Casebrief
    • Baer Reed

    In re John's Bean Farm of Homestead, Inc.

    John's Bean Farm of Homestead, Inc. (debtor) borrowed money from William Klein (creditor) to purchase a piece of equipment. The creditor purported to perfect a security interest in the equipment by filing a UCC-1 Financing Statement with the state...
  • baerreedauthor
    baerreedauthor
    • over 1 year ago
    • Casebrief
    • Baer Reed

    Mathias v. Accor Econ. Lodge

    The business invitees had made reservations to stay at a property owned by the motel company. They were rented a room known by the company to be infested with ticks. The invitees were bitten numerous times.
  • baerreedauthor
    baerreedauthor
    • over 1 year ago
    • Casebrief
    • Baer Reed

    Clark v. Teeven Holding Co.

    Third-party plaintiff purchaser had filed a complaint against third-party defendant seller for money damages when the land it purchased was contaminated by seepage from an underground storage tank. Third-party defendant had filed a motion to dismiss the...
  • baerreedauthor
    baerreedauthor
    • over 1 year ago
    • Casebrief
    • Baer Reed

    Hassler v. Circle C Res.

    Circle C Resources sued its former employee Hassler, for breach of a noncompete agreement. The former employee claimed the agreement was unenforceable and void as against public policy
  • Joshua Lloyd
    Joshua Lloyd
    • over 2 years ago
    • Law Books
    • Law Books

    Possessing Marijuana in California Prisons Still Illegal per State Supreme Court

    This article appears in the Spring 2023 Inmate Litigation Reporter , an exclusive quarterly digest analyzing new legal developments affecting the rights of people in prison -- developed specifically for people in prison. To learn more about this content...
  • baerreedauthor
    baerreedauthor
    • over 2 years ago
    • Casebrief
    • Baer Reed

    United States v. McKittrick

    Defendant was convicted of violations of the Endangered Species Act (ESA), regulations promulgated pursuant to the ESA, and the Lacey Act after he killed and transported a wolf that was part of an experimental population protected by the ESA. Defendant...
  • baerreedauthor
    baerreedauthor
    • over 3 years ago
    • Casebrief
    • Baer Reed

    Wpc Enters. v. United States

    Plaintiff manufactured and supplied to defendant government electric generator sets. Defendant insisted that, as to five components of the generator sets, the contract required plaintiff to furnish components made by named manufacturers. Plaintiff claimed...
<>
LexisNexis
privacy policy consumer access terms & conditions Cookie Policy
Copyright © 2025 LexisNexis
LexisNexis