Menu SIGN IN
  • Vinayak Kohli
    Vinayak Kohli
    • over 4 years ago
    • Case Opinion
    • case

    Curry v. Revolution Labs.,LLC

    Curry v. Revolution Labs.,LLC United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit September 11, 2019, Argued; February 10, 2020, Decided No. 17-2900 Opinion  [*388]  Ripple , Circuit Judge . Charles Curry brought this action pro se 1 in the district...
  • baerreedauthor
    baerreedauthor
    • over 4 years ago
    • Casebrief
    • Baer Reed

    Shimrak v. Goodsir

    This is an appeal on questions of law concerning the interpretation of a financing contingency clause in a residential property purchase agreement. The seller of the property alleged that after the buyers were neither approved nor denied financing for...
  • Vinayak Kohli
    Vinayak Kohli
    • over 4 years ago
    • Case Opinion
    • case

    United States ex rel. Wilson v. Kellogg Brown & Root, Inc.

    United States ex rel. Wilson v. Kellogg Brown & Root, Inc. United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit March 19, 2008, Argued; May 16, 2008, Decided No. 07-1516 Opinion  [*373]  WILKINSON, Circuit Judge: This case arises from a qui tam action...
  • Vinayak Kohli
    Vinayak Kohli
    • over 4 years ago
    • Case Opinion
    • case

    Haelan Labs., Inc. v. Topps Chewing Gum, Inc.

    Haelan Labs., Inc. v. Topps Chewing Gum, Inc. United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit January 6, 1953, Argued ; February 16, 1953, Decided No. 158, Docket 22564 Opinion  [*867]  FRANK, Circuit Judge. After a trial without a jury, the trial...
  • Vinayak Kohli
    Vinayak Kohli
    • over 4 years ago
    • Case Opinion
    • case

    Fresenius USA, Inc. v. Baxter Int'l, Inc.

    Fresenius USA, Inc. v. Baxter Int'l, Inc. United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit July 2, 2013, Decided 2012-1334, 2012-1335 Opinion  [***1366]   [*1331]  Dyk , Circuit Judge . Appellants Fresenius USA, Inc. and Fresenius Medical Care...
  • Vinayak Kohli
    Vinayak Kohli
    • over 4 years ago
    • Case Opinion
    • case

    Jones & Laughlin Steel Corp. v. Pfeifer

    Jones & Laughlin Steel Corp. v. Pfeifer Supreme Court of the United States February 28, 1983, Argued ; June 15, 1983, Decided No. 82-131 Opinion  [*525]   [***776]   [**2544]  JUSTICE STEVENS delivered the opinion of the Court. Respondent was injured...
  • Vinayak Kohli
    Vinayak Kohli
    • over 5 years ago
    • Case Opinion
    • case

    United States v. Raia

    United States v. Raia United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit April 2, 2020, Filed No. 20-1033 Opinion  [*595]  OPINION OF THE COURT SMITH, Chief Judge . ] The First Step Act empowers criminal defendants to request compassionate release for...
  • Vinayak Kohli
    Vinayak Kohli
    • over 5 years ago
    • Case Opinion
    • case

    Chi. Bldg. Design, P.C. v. Mongolian House, Inc.

    Chi. Bldg. Design, P.C. v. Mongolian House, Inc. United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit February 13, 2013, Argued; October 23, 2014, Decided No. 12-3037 Opinion  [*611]   [***1541]  Sykes , Circuit Judge . This case involves claims of...
  • Vinayak Kohli
    Vinayak Kohli
    • over 5 years ago
    • Case Opinion
    • case

    Romag Fasteners, Inc. v. Fossil, Inc.

    Romag Fasteners, Inc. v. Fossil, Inc. United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit August 9, 2017, Decided 2016-1115, 2016-1116, 2016-1842 Opinion  [*1333]   [***1631]  Dyk , Circuit Judge . Romag Fasteners, Inc. ("Romag") owns U.S...
  • Vinayak Kohli
    Vinayak Kohli
    • over 5 years ago
    • Case Opinion
    • case

    Gilbert Tex. Constr., L.P. v. Underwriters at Lloyd's London

    Gilbert Tex. Constr., L.P. v. Underwriters at Lloyd's London Supreme Court of Texas October 6, 2009, Argued; December 17, 2010, Opinion Delivered NO. 08-0246 Opinion  [*121]  We deny Gilbert Texas Construction's motion for rehearing. We withdraw...
<>
LexisNexis
privacy policy consumer access terms & conditions Cookie Policy
Copyright © 2025 LexisNexis
LexisNexis