• Paul v. Flannery

    Appellants, husband and wife, driver and passenger of a car, respectively, were found liable at trial in a jury verdict for injuries to respondent motorcyclist when he collided with appellants' car at an intersection. Appellants sought review of the...
  • Greene v. Commonwealth

    Medical testimony established that defendant killed his wife by deeply cutting her throat. He argued that the evidence was insufficient to prove that he was not acting under an extreme emotional disturbance (EED) at the time of the death.
  • Kahane v. Jansen

    Years ago, defendants Lynn and Cindy Jansen sued Brent Tucker, Tucker's company T.A. Tucker Associates, Inc. (TATA), and their attorney, plaintiff Dennis Kahane for breach of fiduciary duty, fraud (concealment), constructive fraud, unfair business...
  • Rivera v. NIBCO, Inc.

    Plaintiffs Martha Rivera, Mao Her et al., were Latina and Southeast Asian female immigrants once employed as production workers at defendant NIBCO's factory in California. Although their job descriptions did not require English proficiency, defendant...
  • Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. Ind. Elec. Workers Pension Tr. Fund IBEW

    Plaintiff IBEW was a retirement system that provided retirement benefits to electrical workers in Indiana. On the other, defendant Wal-Mart operated stores in 27 different countries and employed about 2.2 million people worldwide. At all times, plaintiff...
  • Unverzagt v. Miller

    Unverzagt v. Miller Supreme Court of Michigan June 10, 1943, Submitted; Calendar No. 42,388; September 7, 1943, Decided; Rehearing denied October 15, 1943. Reconsideration denied November 29, 1943 Docket No. 56 Opinion  [*262]   [**850]  BOYLES, C.J....
  • United States v. Hixon

    Defendant, who received disability benefits, had indicated in his application that he was not self-employed. He was later investigated and found to have worked for a corporation, which he owned. He was charged under § 1001 with knowingly and willfully...
  • United States v. Harvey

    Defendant was charged with the crimes of armed robbery and larceny, violations of 18 U.S.C.S. § 2113(a) and (b). At trial, the district court excluded, as collateral evidence under Fed. R. Evid. 613(b), proffered testimony by defendant's mother...
  • Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act (GLBA) Privacy Requirements

    Federal and state regulatory agencies are focused on the actions of financial institutions and financial technology companies (fintech), with an emphasis on data privacy. Existing laws and regulations generally require institutions to have reasonably...
  • Hamilton v. Yavapai Cmty. Coll. Dist.

    Hamilton v. Yavapai Cmty. Coll. Dist. United States District Court for the District of Arizona August 19, 2021, Decided; August 20, 2021, Filed No. CV-12-08193-PCT-GMS LEAD CASE; No. CV-15-08095-PCT-GMS (CONSOL. FOR TRIAL) Opinion ORDER Pending before...